Wikispecies:Oversighters/Requests/Dan Koehl

From Wikispecies
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This is an archive of closed discussions. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this archive.

Result: This nomination failed to garner at least 25 support votes as per policy for obtaining access. OhanaUnitedTalk page 15:19, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikispecies has no local oversighter. Since I had the communitys confidence regarding the previous application for Checkusers rights, I herebye apply to get Oversighters user rights, as a request to the Wikispecies community, as per local Oversight policy on META. On wikis without an m:Arbitration Committee, the community must approve oversighters by consensus. The candidates must request it within the local community and advertise this request to the local community properly (community discussion page, mailing list, etc). After gaining consensus (at least 70–80% in pro/con voting or the highest number of votes in multiple choice elections) in their local community, and with at least 25–30 editors' approval, the user should request access on m:Steward requests/Permissions with a link to the community's decision. I am well over 18 years of age, of legal age in my place of residence, and I am already identified to the Wikimedia Foundation (Verify identification at Wikimedia). I already signed the Wikimedia Foundation's confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information and I am familiar with the privacy policy.

Please also note that Oversighter actions are logged, but for privacy reasons the logs are only visible to other Oversighters. Because of this, Wikispecies must always have no fewer than two oversighters, for mutual accountability. I don't want to suggest anyone, but hope that someone feel inspired and will step forward and also apply for oversighters rights.

Dan Koehl (talk) 12:35, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for oversighter run for two weeks.
Poll started 13:25, 3 March 2017 (UTC). Poll ends 13:25, 17 March 2017 (UTC).


  1.  Support — He convinced me. - BanKris (talk) 13:25, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support — Me too. Seems a very good idea all in all to have Oversighters. Andyboorman (talk) 14:09, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support per above. Trusted user and a need for local oversighters. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:03, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  SupportAlvaro Molina ( - ) 15:06, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:09, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support Nothing against ;) Céréales Killer (talk) 15:15, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 15:53, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support Full confidence! Orchi (talk) 16:12, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support Plantdrew (talk) 16:56, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support MKOliver (talk) 18:07, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support --Samuele2002 (talk) 18:53, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  SupportJustin (koavf)TCM 19:41, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support --EncycloPetey (talk) 21:09, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support --DenesFeri (talk) 08:57, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support Burmeister (talk) 14:05, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support Accassidy (talk) 17:16, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support Jianhui67 (talk) 15:33, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  SupportGreen Giant (talk) 22:49, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  SupportTommy Kronkvist (talkcontribsblock logall projects) 18:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC).[reply]
  20.  Support - PeterR (talk) 18:41, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support - Franz Xaver (talk) 14:39, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



For greater visibility, all requests made here are transcluded onto the central Wikispecies:Requests for Comment page.

The above discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this archive.