Wikispecies:Checkusers/Requests/Koavf

From Wikispecies
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Koavf (talk-contribs-block-all projects)

This poll has closed. Final results:
  • 25  Support
  • 3 Oppose
  • 2 Neutral
  • 83% approval (89% not counting neutral votes). This nomination passes, pending any community review of the voting process.

As pointed out at Wikispecies:Checkusers/Requests/Dan_Koehl, for us to have one Check User, we must have at least two. I am happy to serve the community here if that's what others think is best. Dan and I are also in opposite time zones so that will help us have more comprehensive coverage. I have had admin rights here for a year, have advanced rights on a few other wikis (custodian on en.v, bureaucrat on outreach, etc.) as well as Staff rights on WikiIndex and I have Check User on wikilivres:. I had an unsuccessful bid here for bureaucratship and have had a some successes and setbacks with my initiatives here. I hope that everyone who !votes gives careful consideration and if you think I'm not a good fit, please nominate yourself so that at least DK can get the rights he deserves to serve the community.

Regarding verification, I am a very verified wiki user and can provide proof to the WMF if necessary.

—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:06, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Poll started 05:28, 28 January 2017 (UTC). Poll ends 05:28, 11 february 2017 (UTC). Dan Koehl (talk) 22:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1.  Support Trusted User. Alvaro Molina (Hablemos) 05:28, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support AfroBrazilian (talk) 08:33, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support -- Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:26, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support -- Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 15:17, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support Dan Koehl (talk) 15:24, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support Andyboorman (talk) 15:28, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support MKOliver (talk) 16:43, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support Burmeister (talk) 17:27, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support Accassidy (talk) 18:36, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support --Hector Bottai (talk) 19:27, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support --RLJ (talk) 19:51, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support -- Neferkheperre (talk) 20:25, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support -- BanKris (talk) 07:40, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support --Info-farmer (talk) 00:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support --Thiotrix (talk) 15:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support -- Floscuculi (talk) 00:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support --Jianhui67 (talk) 11:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support Céréales Killer (talk) 14:27, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support Stephen G. Brown (talk) 20:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support --Djiboun (talk) 21:12, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support -- Mariusm (talk) 05:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support --世界首都环游 (talk) 09:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support Plantdrew (talk) 20:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Support - user:UtherSRG (talk) 22:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Support - Brya (talk) 05:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC) : I guess three is better than two.[reply]

Oppose

  1. Oppose Fagus (talk) 06:48, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose --Murma174 (talk) 10:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose --This is a taxonomic project. I'm not convinced on your experience in that matter. lycaon (talk) 05:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    1. @Lycaon: Please can you explain the relevance of that, to the use of checkuser tools? — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pigsonthewing (talk • contribs) 9 February 2017.

Neutral

For greater visibility, all requests made here are transcluded onto the central Wikispecies:Requests for Comment page.

Please place any additional comments below:

Retrieved from "https://species.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikispecies:Checkusers/Requests/Koavf&oldid=8505981"