I agree with @RLJ: Taxonbar does not belong in Links - see Pump Discussion and make your point, if you wish to change accepted practice on WS. I will leave Sideritis romana subsp. curvidens as a discussion point. Andyboorman (talk) 13:18, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Eriobotrya and Rhaphiolepis
I have had a look through this synonymy and cross checked Liu et al. (2020) and IPNI, unfortunately, have the authors made some errors. One or two are auto-correctable and these has been undertaken by IPNI, but the error for Rhaphiolepis loquata B.B.Liu & J.Wen, Front. Plant Sci. 10-1731: 11 (2020) is fundamental and results in a illegal name. See here. This is a shame as the combination refers to the economically important loquat hrough the name Eriobotrya japonica. Not good as E. japonica will have to remain on the Eriobotrya taxon page until this mess has been cleared up. I have contacted Dr Liu through ResearchGate and await his response. Such is life. Stay safe. Andyboorman (talk) 14:12, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Changes to style
Hello Fagus. You are busy changing the look and feel of Taxon Pages. Why have you not contributed to the Pump discussion? It looks like you have support for the changes, but not for just imposing them without discussion. Please contribute and also remove the tag on your User Page, which is obviously incorrect. Thanks Andyboorman (talk) 15:43, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Fagus - you've added the author link Sennikov to a lot of species pages in Aria, Hedlundia, etc. Unfortunately, this is a disambiguation page; all the links should instead point to Alexander Nikolaevitsch Sennikov (by using the link form [[Alexander Nikolaevitsch Sennikov|Sennikov]]). Could you correct these links, please? I don't have time for it, regrettably. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 23:19, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
We sent you an e-mail
Really sorry for the inconvenience. This is a gentle note to request that you check your email. We sent you a message titled "The Community Insights survey is coming!". If you have questions, email firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can see my explanation here.
- You have not added the correct protologues and synonyms. I have added most of the protologues but few of the synonyms for the pages you created. Andyboorman (talk) 09:07, 5 December 2020 (UTC)