Talk:Main Page

From Wikispecies
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive
Archives
1 (2004-09-14—2009-07-31) 2 (2009-08-01—2015-12-31)
3 (2016-01-01—xxxx-xx-xx)  

References[edit]

Global biodiversity estimation[edit]

  • Appeltans, W. et al. (in press, 2012). The magnitude of global marine species diversity. Current biology, doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.036
  • Bacher, S. 2012. Still not enough taxonomists: reply to Joppa et al. Trends in ecology & evolution 27(2): 65–66. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.003
  • Bebber, D.P. et al. 2007. Predicting unknown species numbers using discovery curves. Proceedings of the Royal Society (B) 274(1618): 1651–1658. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0464
  • Caley, M.J., Fisher, R. & Mengersen, K. 2014. Global species richness estimates have not converged. Trends in ecology & evolution, doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.02.002
  • Carvalho, M.R. de et al. 2013: Does counting species count as taxonomy? On misrepresenting systematics, yet again. Cladistics, doi: 10.1111/cla.12045 reference page 
  • Costello, M.J., May, R.M. & Stork, N.E. 2013. Can we name Earth's species before they go extinct? Science 339(6118): 413–416. doi: 10.1126/science.1230318
  • Costello, M.J., May, R.M. & Stork, N.E. 2013. Response to comments on “Can We Name Earth’s Species Before They Go Extinct?” Science 341(6143): 237 doi: 10.1126/science.1237381
  • Costello, M.J. et al. 2013. Biodiversity data should be published, cited, and peer reviewed. Trends in ecology & evolution 28(8): 454–461. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.05.002 Reference page. 
  • Costello, M.J. et al. 2013. Global coordination and standardisation in marine biodiversity through the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) and related databases. PLoS ONE 8(1): e51629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051629 Reference page. 
  • Costello, M.J., Wilson, S. & Houlding, B. 2012. Predicting total global species richness using rates of species description and estimates of taxonomic effort. Systematic biology 61(5): 871–883. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syr080
  • Costello, M.J., Wilson, S. & Houlding, B. 2013. More taxonomists describing significantly fewer species per unit effort may indicate that most species have been discovered. Systematic biology 62(4): 616–624. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syt024
  • Fontaine, B. et al. 2012. New species in the Old World: Europe as a frontier in biodiversity exploration, a test bed for 21st Century taxonomy. PLoS ONE 7(5): e36881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036881
  • Joppa, L.N., Roberts, D.L. & Pimm, S.L. 2011. The population ecology and social behaviour of taxonomists. Trends in ecology & evolution 26(11): 551–553. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.07.010
  • Hamilton, A.J. et al. 2010. Quantifying uncertainty in estimation of tropical arthropod species richness. American naturalist 176(1): 90–95. doi: 10.1086/652998
  • Mora, C. et al. 2011. How many species are there on Earth and in the ocean? PLoS Biol 9(8): e1001127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127
  • Samyn, Y. & De Clerck, O. 2012. No name, no game. European journal of taxonomy, (10): 1–3. doi: 10.5852/ejt.2012.10

Other[edit]

Links[edit]

Hesperia (Sloperia)[edit]

You know the butterfly Hesperia (Sloperia) proto (Ochsenheimer – 1808)? Help me if you can please, thanks --Marica Massaro (talk) 19:32, 22 August 2016 (UTC).

This butterfly is Muschampia proto PeterR (talk) 07:41, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Page inconsistence (Language)[edit]

When I click on Wikispecies in other languages -> Deutsch, I see the German version of this page, which is correct. Clicking on Deutsch in the left column of In Wikipedia sould give me the same result. But there I get the German Wikipedia main page instead – and that is not correct. 2001:A61:304C:7E01:80F1:E05E:F644:3246 16:21, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

That link is supposed to be a link to the Wikipedia main page, and if you click on the "Deutsch" link you are supposed to reach the main page of the German Wikipedia language version. However, since the menu headline says "In Wikipedia" one can argue that users may expect to instead reach the Wikipedia page regarding Wikispecies, rather than the main page. Perhaps we should change the headline to simply say "Wikipedia"? –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 07:32, 18 October 2016 (UTC).
I don't get the reason why this should be different to all other WP-articles. In ANY WP-topic clicking on the left column means to go to the same article in the clicked language (if there is one in this language). So why should anyone mean, there could be a better mechanism here doing other? (this would be like producing a media player, where a button is marked exactly like the play-button in any other media playing system, but don't starting the playing HERE). It is ridiculous to assume that anyone needs a link to Wikipedia in his own language - since if anyone uses Wikipedia, he will knew how to get there without many thinking. But if i'm anywhere within a specific topic - possibly got there by hopping link after link after link etc., then it is obviously a possible need to get the same page in another language. But any link to the WP main page is nothing else but useless decoration. 2001:A61:3068:8F01:58BD:CE3D:39BF:4AAF 13:54, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
I agree. However, it turns out changing the left menu items is not trivial, even for a Wikispecies bureaucrat such as myself. I'll look in to it though. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 15:28, 19 October 2016 (UTC).