User talk:Ark

From Wikispecies
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Faendalimas in topic De-adminship warning
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to Wikispecies!

Hello, and welcome to Wikispecies! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

If you have named a taxon, then it is likely that there is (or will be) a Wikispecies page about you, and other pages about your published papers. Please see our advice and guidance for taxon authors.

If you have useful images to contribute to Wikispecies, please upload them at Wikimedia Commons. This is also true for video or audio files containing bird songs, whale vocalization, etc.

Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username (if you're logged in) and the date. Please also read the Wikispecies policy What Wikispecies is not. If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or in the Village Pump. Again, welcome!

Lycaon 09:28, 28 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Lycaon :) Ark 09:47, 28 July 2006 (UTC)Reply



Hello, thanks for all your work in Mammalia. In Mammal Species of the World 3rd ed. from 2005 Pelea was placed Reduncinae, I removed the old link from Bovidae now. If you have a better source for Pelea feel free to give it, and I'll change it back. --Kempm 15:47, 18 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

OK sorry to be in your way :) --Kempm 15:54, 18 November 2006 (UTC)Reply



The 100,000 article mark is just around the corner. Please consider stating your preference for a celebration logo on this page. Additional logo proposals are also very welcome. Thanks. Lycaon 09:03, 20 May 2007 (UTC)Reply


The admins' T-shirt.

Congratulations, Ark. You are now an administrator. Always keep an eye on Category:Candidates for speedy deletion and delete nonsense and mistakenly created articles. OhanaUnitedTalk page 15:03, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Not Sure


Good call, that's no arabic. OhanaUnitedTalk page 15:37, 21 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes, he made a mistake. Simply tell him nicely and offer your help if he needs it. OhanaUnitedTalk page 02:55, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
For User:Oscar Roth Andersen, I rolled back the IP's edits[1] but keep the rest. It's just a user trying to make a joke using taxonavigation table. Next, we got Rhantus elisabethae. I formatted it but having problem with the image to be placed inside the picture box. Not sure if it's just my computer or if it's happening on all computers. Do let me know how it looks on your side. And finally, I salvaged the Kakadudessus tomweiri because it's quite easy to fix it back to good shape. Try avoid tagging and/or deleting pages not using standard formatting if it can be fixed in few minutes. Scientists start to love the wiki because they can observe how information transforms by public-at-large, but become furious if their time spent was deleted in the end. OhanaUnitedTalk page 20:27, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Same, I can view it after being downloaded, but not showing it directly on the page. OhanaUnitedTalk page 02:35, 18 October 2009 (UTC)Reply



You have deleted some of my pages... there must have been a misunderstanding. I moved some page to my own namespace, but these was deleted too... can you put them back?

User:Epibase/edit page User:Epibase/edit page references User:Epibase/disambig

UME 18:10, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

It might not be you fault at all... it's more likely I made some mistake... thank you for your help UME 19:00, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Help undo move


I moved Eugenia foetida to Eugenia maleolens as I thought this name had priority, but I was wrong. Could you please help me undo this move? Eugenia maleolens should redirect to Eugenia foetida. UME 13:01, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

I found new date, do this is not needed, thanx UME 13:16, 3 October 2009 (UTC)



It works most of the time. The regex could use a tweaking, but its enough for what I use it for. You should try the other little script I have for doing replacements. It's the first section of code on User:Rocket000/monobook.js. What it does is create a tab that when you click it you get a popup asking what to search for and then what to replace it with. It can be quite powerful. You don't even need to know regex that well to start using it (ask me if you want a quick overview of the syntax, there's really only a couple things you need to do most of what you'd want). You'll find most characters are treated as literals anyway. Rocket000 20:23, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

How to cite


Could you format some of these refs to show me correct form, please. Regards, Ark (talk page) 22:21, 13 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

I only have time to do this one for now:
  • Roa-Varón, A.; Ortí, G. 2009: Phylogenetic relationships among families of Gadiformes (Teleostei, Paracanthopterygii) based on nuclear and mitochondrial data. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 52: 688-704. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.03.020

there is no point in adding the PMED link if there is a doi

Alcoasia amazonica


Well, I'm not sure what you want me to do. Alocasia ×amazonica André might to be an invalid name, maybe better refered to as Alocasia 'Amazonica'. However, the fact that it is not listed in IPNI or Tropicos is not a guarantee that is hasn't been described to science. There are MANY names not listed there which still is indeed correctly published. In my opinion the name could deserve a place in Wikispecies even if it's not valid as it is in general use.... with a clear notation that this is an illegitme name. I have included Clematis ×fargesioides, a name in use, but probably without a formal publication.

I've contacted IPNI and GRIN for a comment on Alocasia amazonica. Epibase 01:00, 14 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
After a discussion with IPNI I've moved the name to nothospecific status and confirmed it is invalid. But, it will probably be validated rather soon...Epibase 22:08, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply



Jeszcze długa droga przede mną :) Projekt wydaje się zupełnie inny niż wikipedia, o wiele bardziej "specjalistyczny". Gdybym miał jakieś pytania, to czy mogę się zwracać do Ciebie? - jesteś jedynym polskim adminem... (gdybym - na razie staram się tylko czytać) DrPZ 21:45, 18 November 2009 (UTC)Reply



Cowania is a genus in the tribus Cheritrini after Tolweb etc. I have no further documentation about that some tribes are now subtribes. So for the time being i let stay it. I shall surch in documentation for more details. Next week i shall rename Cowania (Cheritrini). Thanks for your attention.

There are more Cowania genera. Therefore i have made Cowania (Cheritrini). So Cowania can delete. I have transferred the species to Cowania (Cheritrini). I had make a mistake to change under Cowania the genus in Cowania (Cheritrini). If you delete Cowania than everything is ok.

PeterR 10:02, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply



Tyle wystarczy? Ag.Ent talk 13:16, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wiem :) Ag.Ent talk 13:21, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

References format


Hello Ark,

Thanks for your fine contributions. Please treat the references in the standard taxonomic format where publication name is in italics and publication issue is in bold.

Instead of:

  • Gill, T. N. (1862) Notice of a collection of the fishes of California presented to the Smithsonian Institution by Mr. Samuel Hubbard. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia v. 14: 274-282.

Please type:

  • Gill, T. N. (1862) Notice of a collection of the fishes of California presented to the Smithsonian Institution by Mr. Samuel Hubbard. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, v. 14: 274-282.

Mariusm 16:35, 28 November 2009 (UTC)Reply



Are you sure that "Aarn" means Ivantsoff, A. ? Ark (talk page) 22:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

The authors are Aarn and Walter Ivantsoff, i.e., Aarn Ivantsoff and Walter Ivantsoff Stho002 22:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
I don't think so: [2] Ark (talk page) 22:14, 1 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
how about ION? Stho002 22:22, 1 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
there seems to be confusion - I'll leave it to you to sort out! Stho002 22:23, 1 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
The same is in Fishbase refs, but I believe Eschmeyer, Nelson, and other editors e.g. this pdf. Ark (talk page) 22:28, 1 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
it is odd! Aarn and Walter Ivantsoff's names usually occur together, so it might even be one person! I will send an email to, and ask for clarification. Stho002 22:32, 1 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
I emailed:

I am a Wikispecies editor. A fellow editor who is adding some references on fish has raised an issue concerning the correct citation of your name. Can you please clarify your full name, and if Walter Ivantsoff is someone else, or another name for you (or part of your name)

Email has just bounced back undeliverable! Stho002 22:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
I will see if anyone on Taxacom knows anything? Stho002 22:39, 1 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
A reply from Taxacom:

Yes, he is an Australian ichthyologist -- often publishing with Walter Ivantsoff, also of Australia. Aarn is an Aust aboriginal name -- just one name! His refs come first in my Fishes of the world. Joe



It is still best to give a warning first - particularly in this case where it isn't clearly malicious vandalism. If the editor wishes to continue in Wikispecies, he won't want to have a block on his record without good reason. Stho002 22:46, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Synonyms/old combinations


It is better not to delete pages for synonyms/old combinations, but to redirect them to the valid name. people might search under old names ... Stho002 21:00, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

It is sometimes very difficult to get a point across to PeterR. Stho002 21:05, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply



Thanks for the block on Sugar daddy. --Kevmin 10:43, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Fenerbahce type species


Replacement names always take the type species of the names that they replace, so you only need to state the type species of Adamas (by monotypy). I indicate that Fenerbahce is a replacement name by indenting it under Adamas in the synonymy. It is clearer this way. Stho002 22:29, 21 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Do weryfikacji


Trudna sprawa – te najbardziej oczywiste przypadki (Deinotherium) usunąłem, ale nie mogę obiecać, że to wszystko. Niektóre, takie jak Anancus, Morrillia czy Paratetralophodon, mogą być w rzeczywistości bazalnymi Elephantoidea, ale niestety jedno źródło przedstawiało bardzo uproszczony kladogram (DOI: 10.1002/9780470344484.ch1), a do pełnego tekstu drugiego (DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2004.04.011) nie mam niestety dostępu, więc nie jestem w stanie w pełni zweryfikować. Ag.Ent talk 00:56, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

User:Babe Ruthless


Deleted page and left a message on user talk. OhanaUnitedTalk page 01:13, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply



Thanks for your help. Indead i was fraighten that all my contributions were disappeard. The templates sgssplast and sgssp are normal. If it is necessary that you get first the species and than with move button can create the subgenus you have to change the template from sgssplast and sgssp to. If this is not necessary than you have to change the sgsplast and sgsp in the old template.

PeterR 09:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Blocking user


If you see that person, block on sight and delete all relevant and related pages. He is the first one, and I think the only one, that is totally banned from any Wikimedia projects. For full information, read en:Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/JarlaxleArtemis. OhanaUnitedTalk page 10:09, 27 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Marking of edit as a vandalism



I don't feel comfortable with your marking of my edit as a "vandalism". It has been regular and justified edit. Please, weight your words next time and if you are not sure why some edit has been done, feel free to rather ask first then blindly revert.

Thanks for cooperation.

Danny B. 11:23, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

New page format


Your proposed concept looks very nice! Well done! We need more users like you here at WS. Look also for my comment at the Village Pump. Mariusm 05:27, 16 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I would prefer if you don't change actual pages for testing purposes, so please use a copy of Beryx in your userspace and revert the actual page back to how it was ... Stho002 20:42, 17 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Re:New Zealand


Thanks for the heads up on that one! I don't see why the scope of the project can't be added to slightly in obviously relevant ways, so as to improve the site, so I have reverted the speedy deletion request. Stho002 (talk) 20:44, 30 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Lessonia Swainson & co.


The problems likely result from the recent move, edit, move, edit that happened, as they were fine before. The server queue may not have caught up with the last version. --EncycloPetey (talk) 01:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Zlot "siostrzyczek"


Byłoby fajnie, gdyby ktoś z tego projektu się pojawił :) Tym samym zapraszam na Sabat. Przykuta (talk) 21:12, 7 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Spathiopus cojimarensis

  1. I don't know how to give the right format to the references
  2. Lalana is a red wikilink.

What to do? thanks --Pierpao (talk) 18:52, 29 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'll try to find lalana-- 16:02, 30 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Full name i mean of course-bye-Pierpao (talk) 15:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Found - Bye--Pierpao (talk) 03:15, 19 November 2010 (UTC)Reply



Hi, Ark,
Could you explain your actions around Calafia. Have you seen Maresiella, where I have explicitely noticed the publication, where Calafia was synonymised? If that was a mistake, please restore the right state. Kuzia (talk) 11:38, 6 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I know, that Calafia as a distinct taxon of Stenetriidae persists througout web databases. The primary source is isolist. I like this database, just because such great isopodologists worked (and work) on it, as Marilyn Schotte, Brian Kensley and (rarely) George Wilson. But I see there many mistakes. During my work in WS I base myself upon published articles. And that reference to Wilson's opinion is the only recent notice about the status of Calafia in the "paper" literature. Another indication is the ignorance of Calafia by Wilson in his review of the Stenetriidae (Serov, Wilson, 1995). So, we have a published opinion of Dr Wilson (the leader specialist on asellotes) of 2001 and an unpublished page in the web database, made (probably "by default") by Dr Schotte in 2007. Thus, let's follow Wilson's proposal. Could you restore the situation? Kuzia (talk) 15:32, 6 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the job! I try to make species pages more expanded: Maresiella brevicornis (no type material mentioned yet, because I don't have that Carvacho paper right now). Kuzia (talk) 16:02, 6 January 2011 (UTC). P.S. Your English is fine! Could we use Russian if you wish?Reply



Hi, Ark,

could you, please, help my bot to avoid antispam verification, when pasting templates with external links? Kuzia (talk) 19:31, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

No, I mean just Captcha. A first thousand of simple edits I planned to perform without approval (don't I have that right: WS:BOT?). Kuzia (talk) 07:24, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
OK. Kuzia (talk) 08:37, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply



I have answered at my talk page. Thanks for bringing this up. Koumz (talk) 19:43, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply



Thanks. There are 3 other accounts created today plus the IP behind them. 2 of the accounts didn't do anything, but they have unacceptable names and were created at 15:01 today. The vandal also used the IP to vandalize User:Mariusm. Koumz (talk) 16:27, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply



Cześć. Posprzątałem plemię Marmotini. Oczywiście na podstawie Helgen, Kristofer M.; Cole, F. Russel; Helgen, Lauren E.; and Wilson, Don E 2009. Generic Revision in the Holarctic Ground Squirrel Genus Spermophilus. Journal of Mammalogy, 90(2): 270–305. doi:10.1644/07-MAMM-A-309.1. . W trakcie edycji user Stho002 zaczął robić zmiany w formatowaniu - wyżej bo na poziomie Sciuridae. Zmiana polegała na przerobieniu czcionki do formy: Template:Zfg. W konsekwencji "Taxonavigation" niżej się sypie i jest w formie ukrytej. Coś z tym robić? Dla mnie istotna jest strona merytoryczna, więc mnie to nie razi, ale trochę bez sensu. Jacek555 (talk) 11:55, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dalej się blokuje: np.Spermophilus. Zresztą samo Marmotini też. A z Stho002 nie chciałem prowadzić wojny edycyjnej, bo mam w nosie takie gierki. Co jeszce blokuje?Jacek555 (talk) 12:20, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Czyli to, że powyżej rodziny tabela jest zrolowna jest normą? W Sciuromorpha się nie roluje. Chyba że tylko poniżej pewnego taksonu? Hm, wczoraj nawet rodzaje pokazywały się z rozwiniętą tabelą "Taxonavigation", a dziś jako 'hidden'. Takie mam wrażenie że coś się zmieniło. Jacek555 (talk) 12:42, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
OK. Widziałem różnicę, ale nie wiedziałem o zmianie w obrębie szablonu. Dz. Jacek555 (talk) 13:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

LB edits


Hej cześć, dzięki za uwagi. Teraz po ich przeczytaniu właśnie na to wpadłem, ze powinno to być zrobione inaczej. Są jeszcze dwa problemy: 1. Po nazwach taksonow zawsze musi być nazwisko, bo dopiero wtedy wiadomo o jaki takson chodzi (w czyim zrozumieniu). 2. Jak można usunać nieprawidłowy takson , jak np Diplostraca do którego zaliczono (niefortunnie) Cladocera. Pozdrawiam. Leszek--Leszek Bledzki (talk) 20:59, 13 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Dzięki za cenne wskazówki. Już widzę że da się to wpisać inaczej, nie w tytule strony a poniżej, jako „treść” strony i wówczas to już będzie zgodne z Międzynarodową Nomenklaturą Zoologiczną (czy Botaniczną). Na stronie, niestety brak jest niektórych taksonów: Superordo – nadrząd, Subordo – podrząd, Superfamilia – nadrodzina, Subfamilia – podrodzina, wszystkie te odnoszą się do grup zoologicznych (non-plantae). Ja niestety (hyba jeszcze, i nie wiem jak długo) nie mam uprawnień by to zmienić. Bez tego nie można poprawnie wprowadzić sytstematyki wielu grup, (np Cladocera). Czy wiesz jak to zmnienić, lub kto może to zmienić? Jeżeli ktoś inny to daj znać, mogę to też (jak trzeba, napisać po ang.). Przy okazji, jeżeli napotkasz na jakieś problemy merytoryczne związane z taksonomią co do których będziesz miał wątpliwości, to chętnie pomogę – daj znać. Pozdrawiam. --Leszek Bledzki (talk) 22:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Reply



Please don't go (ab)using your admin powers in a destructive way without first getting the consensus of your fellow admins, most of which I feel will allow a certain amount of latitude in formatting. Once a format is put on a page by one editor, it takes consensus to remove it. I think you will find that is the view of most of the active admins here, thanks ... Stho002 (talk) 07:57, 13 January 2013 (UTC) PS: And I have re-protected that template, just because the reason I originally invoked to protect it is a valid reason in the menu of acceptable reasons, contra your reason for unprotecting it .... Stho002 (talk) 08:00, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

re: Ark (talk) 21:02, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Dzień dobry, Ark. Zapraszam do dyskusji tutaj. Kuzia (talk) 21:12, 13 January 2013 (UTC) [TRANSLATION (not exactly, translator version. Ark): Good morning, Ark. Feel free to discuss here ... Stho002 (talk) 21:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)]Reply
Thank you for inviting. I saw it and I would wait for the opinions of other people. Regards, Ark (talk) 21:30, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply



Hi Ark,

could you, please, re-create this page: Incertae_sedis_(Microcerberidae), which was deleted by User:Stho002. There was no discussion as always, so I have no idea, what was the need to leave these pages orphaned: Microcerberus monodi, Microcerberus remyi. These species are listed as incertae sedis in the latest revision of the family I cited. Please, also make a look at other edits, because I see no point. (And these edits changing the classification). I guess, I have no chance to be involved in the process, so I have to ask for your mediation.

A more general question (I haven't ever found an answer): is Template:zfg accepted? Who said, that all family-group names should be in small caps (besides User:Stho002)? (It is not wide-spread in the scientific literature). Was there a discussion here? If yes, why don't we make a bot run to insert it everywhere?

Another point: WS has become a project of one very strange admin. It was completely different when I joined it.

Kuzia (talk) 23:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Forgive, I let you wait for a response but I'd like to know other opinions. There is something wrong with the atmosphere in our project. You are right and we should not stop there. Let's wait a while, please. Ark (talk) 19:41, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Ark, for unblocking me! Kuzia (talk) 20:11, 24 January 2013 (UTC)Reply



On the other hand, Wikimedia sites are not battlegrounds for personal animosities, so plotting an attack to take down an admin could well result in blocks on those responsible for such a plot ... Stho002 (talk) 21:37, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

I perceive it as an intimidation, a personal attack! Ark (talk) 21:41, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
You would! Why don't you spend your energy and time on something more constructive than this nonsense? Stho002 (talk) 21:55, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Let's wait how the community responds. Do they also consider it nonsense. If yes, I will admit Kuzia was right: WS has become a project of one very strange admin. Ark (talk) 22:05, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
I interpret being called "very strange" as a personal attack, and therefore as an abuse of your admin powers ... Stho002 (talk) 22:06, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Do you read your own words? Ark (talk) 22:18, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
I wasn't talking about me, I was talking about YOU! I have not referred to anyone as being "very strange". I just want to contribute constructively to the project (where we only have about 5% coverage overall), rather than waste my time talking to people with other agendas ... Stho002 (talk) 22:21, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Template talk:Sisterprojects-ES


Do you can review my request in Template talk:Sisterprojects-ES? --Vivaelcelta (talk) 21:20, 18 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

 Done. Ark (talk) 09:17, 19 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I have corrected the links and one logo. Do you update the template again? --Vivaelcelta (talk) 14:23, 19 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
No problem :) Ark (talk) 15:34, 19 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your comment needed


Please, your comment is needed on issues concerning the user Stho002. See here: Wikispecies:Village Pump Mariusm (talk) 16:34, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Vote request


Hello, I’m Marius, an admin here at WS. I would like to ask you to contribute to an important ongoing vote which will practically decide the future of WS. As you probably know, the user Stho002, an admin, is forcefully endorsing his concept of the content and format of WS. His “system” includes a complex mesh of templates and links which is nowhere specified or written down, is not considered as a consensus, and is not easy or trivial to use, especially by newcomers. As my experience goes, when I save an edited page, Stho002 will delete or change it sooner or later, sometimes in a matter of seconds. This is no way of maintaining a healthy community. It is a lamentable fact that the aggressiveness by which Stho enforces his way deters many users and causes many newcomers leave this site.

The original WS help pages ([3], [4], [5]) contain a much simpler system, where the resulting taxa information is no less clear nor less detailed then Stho’s format, and which is being used successfully for years by experienced users as well as by novices.

If we decide that our current page format is outdated in need of improvement, we surely must make the change through collaboration and discussion. It is unacceptable that a single user will dictate his concept, however better-suited for our purposes he thinks it is.

We therefore have three options: (a) to make Stho002 system the official WS format; (b) to endorse the system specified in the help pages; (c) to devise a new system by mutual cooperation. After we reach an agreement, we’ll modify the help pages accordingly, resulting in a consistent way of doing things, without having to fight among ourselves, without having to resort to deleting and modifying each other’s work.

Therefore please read the discussion here and take a moment of your time and make your choice here. I think it is your obligation as an admin to participate in the vote. Thanks, Mariusm (talk) 08:54, 13 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Patrol stats


Thanks to Cgt on danish Wp, we can now see statistics on patrolling: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society


Dear Ark,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikispecies project for ten years or more.

Best regards,

Dan Koehl (talk) 09:03, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Third application for checkuser


Further to recent messages, I am also offering to serve, so that we have three checkuser operators, to ensure adequate coverage in case one of the others is unavailable. Please comment at Wikispecies:Checkusers/Requests/Pigsonthewing. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:47, 28 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

De-adminship warning


Dear Ark. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Wikispecies because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Wikispecies:Administrators/Inactivity Section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Wikispecies:Administrators/Admin Review.

Thank you. Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 21:21, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

As per the Admin Review Policy a request to the Stewards has been made (here) to remove your admin user rights. Many thanks for the time you put into Wikispecies and we hope you may have time to coninue in the future. Cheers Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 17:58, 3 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Stewards have removed your admin flag, with many thanks for your past work with Wikispecies. We hope that the in the future you may have time to help here again. Cheers Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 07:58, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply