User talk:MILEPRI

⇒Archive To the end 2018

Orphans

Hi your redirect of Manfreda has created a number of orphan taxon pages, for example Manfreda virginica. I do hope you plan dealing with these by the appropriate data transfers and redirects. I made the same mistake early on in my engagement here and had to go back and correct and it is best done now rather rather later, whilst things are fresh in your mind! Andyboorman (talk) 09:23, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Efectivamente dejé huerfano el taxón de Manfreda virginica (ya está resuelto). Si observa, verá que cambié todos los taxones de Manfreda antes de redireccionarlo, excepto este porque ya había sido cambiado anteriormente y ya figuraba como Agave y dí, sin comprobarlo, que había sido efectuado el cambio. Agradezco su información. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 09:38, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Muscari/Leopoldia

Hi MILEPRI, the independence of Leopoldia from Muscari is highly disputed, it is based on a work of the 1970's, but not on recent investigations, it has a weak morphological and karyological basis and it is not accepted in a majority of recent floras except WCSP, see Talk:Muscari. There are a lot of taxa of Muscari subg. Leopoldia without names in Leopoldia and vice versa. I agree with parallel treatments of the taxa involved as Muscari and as Leopoldia for the moment, but I disagree with a transfer of these taxa from Muscari to Leopoldia by creating redirects in the Muscari species articles, and by changing the species list in the Muscari genus article. Best wishes. --RLJ (talk) 11:38, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Xanthorrhoeaceae

Existe conflicto de edición en Xanthorrhoeaceae que edita wikispecies y Asphodelaceae que reconoce commons. Espero me comunique cual de ellas debo dar por válida. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 19:29, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Estas páginas en WS necesitan edición Saludos.-Andyboorman (talk) 20:30, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Do not use

We do not use BASEPAGENAME on taxon pages. Please edit where you have used this template. Thanks Andyboorman (talk) 14:59, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

I have removed it from a number of pages, but have not replaced it with the correct data! See Asplenium sagittatum. Andyboorman (talk) 15:04, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

variedad / variedades

¡Hola,
un poco de informacion:

• Singular: Varietas
• Plural: Varietates

Saludos. Orchi (talk) 17:45, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Singular: Tribus

Plural: Tribus Botanic Latin nearly as odd as English| Andyboorman (talk) 21:21, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Crocodylium

You would have been better to leave the pages as Crocodilium, but leave it for now - see notes on Crocodylium. I have a feeling that IPNI may do an autocorrect and we will have to revert your changes! It was OK when the genus was a synonym of Centaurea! Regards Andyboorman (talk) 08:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

IPNI have got back to me and made the required changes. I have edited the pages accordingly Crocodilium. Best regards Andyboorman (talk) 21:08, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

OK. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 21:26, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Species template

Hi I have a species level template for Hieracium murorum and see how it works for Hieracium murorum subsp. bithynicum. It it appropriate where there are multiple subspecies, varieties etc.. Please make the changes to the other subspecies you have created. I suggest that you go over your other page creations and follow this praxis where appropriate. Regards Andyboorman (talk) 13:12, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello

Hola usuario legendario MILEPRI, lamento mucho tu expulsión de Wikipedia en español, solo quería saber cuál es tu nacionalidad ¿por favor dímelo para añadirlo en el ranking? muchas gracias. Saludos cordiales desde Lima, Perú --Globalphilosophy (talk) 15:02, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Español. Gracias por su interés.--MILEPRI (talk) 15:24, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Mayodendron

No puedo ver cómo Mayodendron puede pertenecer a Bignonieae. A veces es sinónimo de Radermachera, que pertenece a Tecomeae en WS. ¡Aunque esto realmente pertenece al "clado paleotropical no asignado a una tribu" hasta que se produce una nueva clasificación tribal de Bignoniaceae! WS seguirá la clasificación tribal más antigua hasta que se publique la nueva. ¿Es usted una referencia que no conozco? Regards Andyboorman (talk) 08:56, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

He tomado la referencia de Kew Mayodendron. La he conectado a Bignoniaceae en tribu Incertae sedis. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 09:08, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Odontarrhena

Observo que este género figura como sinónimo de Alyssun en wikispecies, pero según Brassicaceae aquí e IPNI es un género aceptado en 2015. Le ruego me confirme la aceptación para continuar la modificación de este género y evitar el cambio de numerosas especies. Agradecido le saluda.--MILEPRI (talk) 16:31, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Se acepta corregir el género. Ignorar la lista de plantas ahora está desactualizada. Brassibase es preferible como una fuente confiable. Aclamaciones Andyboorman (talk) 19:06, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Unassigned Genera (Brassicaceae)

Hello I have some changes to the above and relevant genera based upon references on the page. Thanks Andyboorman (talk) 10:45, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Required formats.

See consensus re {{DC.}} and so on. Type species MUST be of the genus, Tropicos uses the term "Type specimen", which is NOT the same as Type species. Please review all your edits and correct them in order to maintain consistency with other editors. See Diplotaxis as an example. Tenga en cuenta que Especie tipo, Tipo de muestra, Tipo/Typus NO son términos mutuamente intercambiables. Son conceptos diferentes. Thanks Andyboorman (talk) 19:07, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Tribes and Subfamilies

Hello Cambiaste la tribu Burmannieae a una subfamilia. Eso fue incorrecto. Una forma de ver la diferencia es en el final del epíteto. Las subfamilias tienen la terminación -oideae, tribus -eae hasta el final del género tipo. Esto es una pista, pero tenga en cuenta que puede haber excepciones. Atentamente Andyboorman (talk) 18:14, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

OK, ya lo he rectificado. Gracias por su consejo, Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 18:29, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Calycanthaceae

Calycanthidae is not a subfamily but according to Wu et al. 2002. Synopsis of a new polyphyletic-polychronic-polytopic system of the angiosperms. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 40(4):289-322, it is a class and is now seen as a synonym of Magnoliidae sensu Chase & Reveal = Angiosperms. The system advocated by Wu et al. (2002) is not accepted and is discarded. The correct subfamily is Calycanthoideae. I have corrected WS, but you need to correct Commons!. Andyboorman (talk) 20:16, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Bryophytes in The Plant List

I would recommend AGAINST adding bryophyte links to the Plant List such as this link, because the bryophyte listings in the Plant List are extremely bad. For example, in the link you added for Calypogeiaceae, the Plant List includes the moss genus Mnium, even though Calypogeiaceae is a liverwort family. --EncycloPetey (talk) 21:17, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Sorry to butt in @EncycloPetey: not sure you really meant INPI. In addition, I would now not recommending using The Plant List at all. It used to OK, but so much has changed since 2012, when it was last updated. Use a rapid updating source, as the first resort then cross check. Best regards Andyboorman (talk) 10:00, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

No, I mean The Plant List, which is what MILEPRI linked to. It is what MILEPRI called the link, and is what the target page calls itself. Did you follow the links I pointed to? --EncycloPetey (talk) 15:16, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

{{Catol-ELPT}} @EncycloPetey: yes, thanks that is the one I would use not TPLF, as has been edited into Calypogeiaceae by your good self. Cheers. Andyboorman (talk) 19:03, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Check links

Por favor, compruebe los enlaces ciegos Ha realizado varios de estos simplemente copiando / pegando una lista de enlaces. Ver Cyphioideae donde he tenido que borrar todo menos Tropicos. Govaerts, Hassler, TPLF no tienen páginas para subfamilias, tribus y similares. IPNI puede tener una página pero necesita verificación. Regards Andyboorman (talk) 18:56, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Cyanea aspleniifolia

I have corrected your error for this species and WCSP is incorrect and deleted your page. See the note under Cyanea aspleniifolia for the reasoning. Andyboorman (talk) 10:46, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

OK, la acepté como la última modificación en la presentación de Kew y CatalogueoLife. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 12:33, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

I will contact Kew for comment. Saludos.--Andyboorman (talk) 20:59, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Archive of talk page?

Hello MILEPRI. Your talk page is getting rather long... If you like to, I can help you make an archive of the oldest discussions, perhaps in a similar way as on (the top right) of my talk page? That will make it easier to navigate your talk page, but still keep all the old discussions intact so that they can be checked later, if necessary. Best regards, Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 19:30, 1 August 2019 (UTC).

Regarding redirects

Just a reminder to be careful when redirecting works, as they often have similar or event identical titles or abbreviations. Circeus (talk) 18:03, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi MILEPRI,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikispecies and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 14:34, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Caryopyllaceae

You are completely wrong to re-assign tribes to subfamilies. Please revert. I will now delete the subfamilies from the family page. but add a note. Andyboorman (talk) 11:24, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi MILEPRI,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:14, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Using Spanish on English Taxon Pages

Please do not use sinónimo or Set. etc., use English it will be translated to other languages. Please edit out occurrences, as a matter of urgency, as it makes work for other editors more concerned with more important work here, please. Andyboorman (talk) 21:04, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

OK.--MILEPRI (talk) 21:07, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Magic you do good work, also it is a good idea if Govaerts and Hassler differ to check why. I can help. It is usually in the scientific literature, or may be more dificult such as on Commons. Best regards Andyboorman (talk) 21:19, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

You are using Set. agian!!! Andyboorman (talk) 16:14, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

No entiendo. Estoy poniendo Set. como siempre en inglés, porque vd. me dijo que no usara sept. ¿No le entiendo?.--MILEPRI (talk) 16:23, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Para evita confunsión, pondré September. ¿OK?--MILEPRI (talk) 16:34, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi MILEPRI,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 17:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Terminalia

Hello Please note WikiCommons and WikiData are incorrect when it comes to Terminalia acuminata. See Terminalia phillyreifolia. I will contact Michael Hassler for his opinion. PWO seems to be the better resource using Maurin et al. (2017) more accurately. Good work by the way! Andyboorman (talk) 19:43, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Conozco que Terminalia acuminata no estaba realizada correctamente porque acababa de redireccionarla desde Anogeissus acuminata y esperaba ponerla correctamente cuando llegara a ella en Terminalia, ha sido más rápido y ha llegado antes que yo. El resto de las especies de Anogeissus han sido redireccionadas y cuando llegue a ellas serán actualizadas. Gracias por su ayuda. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 20:07, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

No hay problemas. Seguiré trabajando en géneros para ahora ¡Hay mucho que hacer! Andyboorman (talk) 20:35, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

References in ISSN 0370-2774

Hi MILEPRI, I noticed you added several references in the page ISSN 0370-2774: [1]. Prior to your edit, all references in that page were for documenting the difference between imprint and publication dates. It was not a list of papers published in the Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London; such a list can possibly be found with this link. Do you mind if the references you added are removed? Korg (talk) 18:04, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Ok, thank you! Korg (talk) 18:44, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Double redirect

Have a look at this problem! Alangium salviifolium subsp. hexapetalum and Alangium hexapetalum. OoPs! The later is the correct combination according to WCSP Andyboorman (talk) 12:02, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

OK, error.--MILEPRI (talk) 12:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Synopsis plantarum

Hello MILEPRI, there are many different works called "Synopsis Plantarum" , see IPNI. So your links at Template:Dietrich, 1839, 1840 and 1852 are not correct. Synopsis Plantarum should better be a disambiguation page. Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 08:54, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

In addition, there are many Dietrich see IPNI. Template needs work. Andyboorman (talk) 09:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

@Thiotrix: In fact this page Synopsis Plantarum is misnamed, it should be Synopsis Plantarum: seu Enchiridium botanicum, complectens enumerationem systematicam specierum hucusque cognitarum. Am I correct? Andyboorman (talk) 09:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Yes you are. Thank you, MILEPRI, for your updates of Synopsis Plantarum. --Thiotrix (talk) 10:32, 22 November 2019 (UTC)