User talk:MILEPRI/Archive 3

Publication list on periodical page

Could you not add those? While list of the matching templates are useful for books or multivolume works, for periodicals, they are generally not appropriate and I have had to delete dozens leftover pages and sections from Stephen's time back in November. I am not particularly interested in having to do it again. Circeus (talk) 02:23, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

I agree. They should be deleted, not created... Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 03:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC).

Sortkeys

Hello, when adding sortkeys to pages with DEFAULTSORT or templates loke {{Taxa by author}}, please remember to render the name without any diacritic marks, as those mess with the alphabetic order on Category pages. E.g. François Mathias René Leprieur -> Leprieur, Francois Mathias Rene. Thanks. --Pitke (talk) 23:29, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Mecaspis

Hello, I believe the redirect from Mecaspis to Mecosaspis genera is erroneous. See BioLib, for example. --GeXeS (talk) 13:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Monotypic

How are we defining "monotypic taxon" for purposes here? Only one recognized submember? Only one recognized taxon of immediately lower rank? Only one extant submember? You've tagged some items as "monotypic" that would not be monotypic under some definitions. --EncycloPetey (talk) 18:03, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Links is a subsection

Please note Help:Reference section: The Links section should be a subsection under References, not a separate section on its own. --EncycloPetey (talk) 18:26, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Taxonbar

See Pump Discussion. There is no consensus regarding TaxonBar. I may remove it from pages you edit until consensus is reached. Sorry. It just does not look good compared to other Wikis. Andyboorman (talk) 07:46, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

@Andyboorman:. Lamento la falta de consenso con el taxonbar, ya que me parece una muy util herramienta para completar las referencias de los taxones descritos. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 07:55, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

La sección de referencia solo se utiliza para las fuentes utilizadas para completar la página del taxón. TaxonBar es adicional, por ejemplo, nadie debería usar Wikidata como fuente. Espero que esto ayude. EnWP tiene un enfoque más optimista: consulte Poa. ¿No estás segura de que WS formatea TaxonBar de la misma manera?. De ahí la discusión sobre la bomba. Saludos--Andyboorman (talk) 09:24, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

TaxonBar links to other databases, but does not cite them (as it is required by WCSP and all the others). --RLJ (talk) 18:48, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Empetrum nigrum no consensus

Well good luck on this taxon. No consensus, its a mess!! Andyboorman (talk) 18:06, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

@Andyboorman:. Ya había observado que PWO y Catalogue no coincidian, por eso, sigo los datos de PWO y si cambian serán modificados. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 18:17, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

El problema con PWO es que sus especies y subespecies no cubren toda la sinonimia posible. Al menos COL hace eso, así que usaría esta fuente en su lugar. ¡PWO puede ser desconcertantemente incorrecto a veces! Saludos.--Andyboorman (talk) 19:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

TOC

Use {{TOCcompcat1}} for species not {{TOC}}, which is for genera - please - see Erica. Regards Andyboorman (talk) 18:10, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

@Andyboorman:. OK. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 18:12, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

@Andyboorman:. Lamento decirle que pongo {{TOCcompcat1}} y no funciona, ver Rhododendron--MILEPRI (talk) 18:21, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Sorry mistake {{TOCcompact1}} !! Andyboorman (talk) 19:08, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

OK. funciona correctamente.--MILEPRI (talk) 19:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

@Andyboorman:. Debo comunicarle que {{TOCcompact1}} sigue teniendo un defecto. Con TOC cuando pinchas en una letra, la `página cambia a dicha letra, con {{TOCcompact1}} no ocurre lo mismo. Saludos. --MILEPRI (talk) 21:11, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

¡Todas las letras deben estar en minúsculas! Saludos. --Andyboorman (talk) 07:23, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

@Andyboorman:. Ya me había percatado y así las estoy rectificando. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 07:28, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Parkinsonia

Page names like Parkinsonia L. are correct and accepted. Wikispecies has precedent for this as an accepted page naming format. Using a family name in parentheses is problematic because taxa can move when classifications change. The published name with author identified will never change. Please do not rename pages needlessly. --EncycloPetey (talk) 01:04, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Acacia

You got the edits on Acacia longifolia subsp. sophorae wrong. The references on its page are a major clue. Why did you do this? Andyboorman (talk) 11:11, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

@Andyboorman:. I have followed the changes made by PWO where it indicates that it is a synonym for Acacia sophorae PWO. Regards.--MILEPRI (talk) 14:56, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

No problems they are not always right so double check against other references, the clue was on the Acacia longifolia subsp. sophorae taxon page. See also Worldwide Wattle. I would like to get a template for this resource, but the coding is way above my head! It is the best resource for Acacia and allles. Andyboorman (talk) 17:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Format of synonyms

Hi. Use this format for synonyms please Mariosousa heterophylla not the one you created the page with. Hopefully you have not made too many pages using the odd format for the synonymy. If you have could you please correct them as a matter or urgency. Cheers Andyboorman (talk) 10:52, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

@Andyboorman:: OK.--MILEPRI (talk) 12:38, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

WoldWideWattle template

Hi check the ID number very carefully to get a correct link. See Acaciella angustissima the correct id is -821 not 821. Don't ask me why! You may need to double check previous entries. Cheers Andyboorman (talk) 13:33, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

WP Links

Hello yet again! There is no need to add WP links to taxon pages as these are automatically added on the left-hand side bar. Please delete. Cheers Andyboorman (talk) 13:43, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Vachellia

Hola. He detectado un par de errores en este género. Por favor mira Vachellia karroo et Vachellia villaregalis. También sugiero que haga una verificación cuando use PWO. Es sólo coreect alrededor del 90% de las veces. Sugiero volver y comprobarlo. WorldWideWatlle es el mejor a menos que haya pruebas sólidas de lo contrario, ya que es una base de datos especializada. Salud. Andyboorman (talk) 19:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

@Andyboorman:: Desde la última advertencia uso WorldWideWatlle como base de la información y PWO como acompañante por sus datos de distribución y nombres vernáculos. Gracias por sus consejos. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 19:26, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

"Acacia arabica sens."

Hello MILEPRI, "Acacia arabica sens. Brenan" is neither a name nor should be in the synonyms section. Also redirects from "Acacia arabica sens." and other "names" with sens. are not wanted. These are just misapplications by some authors! Such "names" may be cited under the heading ===Misapplied names=== as Acacia arabica "sensu Brenan" (which means: like botanist Brenan misapplied this name for some other taxon). Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 07:52, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

@Thiotrix:. I appreciate the information, from now on, I will not include taxa with the sens subfix. as synonyms. Regards.--MILEPRI (talk) 08:00, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Asie is bad English

I keep coming across your use of Asie instead of Asia in English language distributions. Please could you correct. Thanks and good work all in all. Andyboorman (talk) 07:56, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Note that in TDWG "Asie" is divided into Asia-Temperate and Asia-Tropical. Cyprus and East Aegean Islands do not belong to Europe, but to Asia-Temperate. Thanks. --RLJ (talk) 08:52, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

And TDWG do not use Asie. Also it is Asia-Temperate Western Asia to be pedantic. Cheers Andyboorman (talk) 10:52, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Picture caption.

Hello we always add a link to the taxon page of the species used on a higher taxon. Thanks Andyboorman (talk) 16:50, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

@Andyboorman:. I always add a reference to a higher taxa on the pages I edit. If in any fault, I would appreciate it if you would inform me to correct it.Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 16:58, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Creation of Author templates are stopped!

Creation of Author templates are stopped! And very likely all of them will be deleted. Please see Village Pump--Estopedist1 (talk) 10:47, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

@Estopedist1:. ¿What should we put in its place? a| o aut|?.--MILEPRI (talk) 10:59, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

The Help Section is very clear. First occurrence of the author it is {{A}} and then {{Aut}}. Andyboorman (talk) 11:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Boraginales

El problema de sus pensamientos con respecto a Amsinckiinae no es solo géneros faltantes, sino también circunscripción de la familia y de hecho el orden. Esto se explica en las páginas de taxón. No hay consenso por lo que es uno u otro, que es APGIV 2016 o Grupo de Trabajo de Boraginales. Por el momento, no se recomienda agregar subtribus a nuestras páginas de tribus existentes. ¡Esta es una de las principales razones por las que no he trabajado en este importante pedido durante meses! Lo mejor es agregar los géneros que faltan y vincular a las tribus por el momento, creo. Atentamente. Hope this helps. Andyboorman (talk) 07:17, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambig fixes on links

You are still not undertaking disambig fixes on links such as PWO, IPNI an so on. Not doing this renders the links useless. Please fix most urgently, as there must be dozens if not hundreds by now. Why are you persisting with this mistake? I am getting bored fixing this problem for you and you are devaluing WS just see Amororpha Please pause and spend some time reviewing your edits to correct mistakes I know I do. Andyboorman (talk) 21:50, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

@Andyboorman: I suppose it means not adding the name of the taxon to the references. It was a mistake, since I made this addition on other pages this day, (see Abrus . I am sorry to indicate that I persist in the error, since as you know, already that follows all my edits, I correct countless errors of others and I have never made any complaints about it.--MILEPRI (talk) 22:15, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Sorry if I caused offence I did not mean to. Aplica a mi amigo. Andyboorman (talk) 14:39, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Ctenodon

If the genus is used in both Codes, you can transform the page into a disambiguation, and not revert my redirect in favour of yours. Regards, Burmeister (talk) 18:20, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

@Burmeister: Perdón, lo eliminé creyendo que era un nombre vernáculo. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 21:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

incorrect primary references

Está utilizando la fuente incorrecta para la especie Grona. He tenido que corregir algunos de tus errores. See Grona styracifolia. Careful do not rush!!!!!! Verifique sus ediciones anteriores por favor. Buen trabajo. Saludos Andyboorman (talk) 23:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

@Andyboorman:. Ya han sido corregidos. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 08:35, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

My reason

Es por eso que utilizo el nombre completo, no solo el formato de fecha del autor. Ahorra confusión y esto es más común en comparación con los animales y donde hay homónimos. Es igual de fácil copiar y pegar desde IPNI. Cheers Andyboorman (talk) 08:29, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Vicia culinaris

@Andyboorman:. Esta especie, a pesar de ser importante, está en conflicto taxonomico entre diferentes autores. Encuentro dificultades para conocer la correcta clasificación de la misma. ¿Tiene alguna referencia actual que lo aclare?. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 08:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Vicia culinaris

@Andyboorman:. Esta especie, a pesar de ser importante, está en conflicto taxonomico entre diferentes autores. Encuentro dificultades para conocer la correcta clasificación de la misma. ¿Tiene alguna referencia actual que lo aclare?. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 08:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Vicia culinaris

@Andyboorman:. Esta especie, a pesar de ser importante, está en conflicto taxonomico entre diferentes autores. Encuentro dificultades para conocer la correcta clasificación de la misma. ¿Tiene allguna referencia actual que lo aclare?. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 08:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Me encontré con un artículo de 2019 que analizaba las poblaciones palestinas de Vicia palaestina Boiss. y Lens culinaris y recomendó que Vicia culinaris sea el nombre correcto. Sin embargo, este es un estudio limitado y es demasiado pronto para hacer una recomendación definitiva. Por lo tanto, Lens se disputa aquí. Trabajaré un poco más en los próximos días. Lens y Vicia son morfológicamente muy diferentes. Espero que esto ayude. Saludos.-- Andyboorman (talk) 09:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)