User talk:98.166.139.216
Udara[edit]
I see from your edits that you seem not be a butterfly specialist. By removing the species from the subgenera lists, you have made it much harder for someone trying to find a particular species page. If they do not know which seb-genus to look in, they will have to scan through them all. You have succeeded in making the user's task harder and, as far as I can see, for no real gain in any other way.
Simply reformatting a page like this and taking information away is not very helpful. Can you please justify why you have done this, and why it should not be reverted? Thank you. Accassidy 22:13, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- What sub-genus are you talking about specifically?98.166.139.216 20:38, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Never mind, I see you used it in the header. I have reverted the edit you speak of because I can now see how one could find it useful. I had removed the list because I had thought that the list was a bit redundant, with the list of species already being in the genera. 98.166.139.216 20:42, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Authors/dates[edit]
Please don't waste your time by adding authors/dates for names above family-group (e.g. Aves) - they mean nothing. Thanks Stho002 01:08, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- No problem. 98.166.139.216 23:03, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify him/her. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.