Talk:Trichochrysea hirta

From Wikispecies
Latest comment: 1 year ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Status of viridis

[edit]

I am not sure if the viridis name is currently treated as a synonym of this species, a subspecies of it, or even a valid species of its own. Here's what I know so far:

From this point, the trail goes cold for me, as it seems to be treated differently depending on the source:

  • Mevedev, 2007 mentions it briefly as being a possible synonym of Trichochrysea hirta, but nothing more. No later publications by Medvedev ever mention viridis alongside hirta so far as I know in what's available online (nor do they give trinomials for hirta altogether, suggesting it no longer uses subspecies).
  • Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera vol. 6 (from 2010) follows Medvedev & Eroshkina, 1999 in treating viridis as a subspecies
  • Meanwhile, some Chinese websites as well as iNaturalist treat it as a valid species Trichochrysea viridis, with its own common name even. Did a Chinese author maybe restore it as a species in a Chinese work, possibly in the 2000s? I have no way of knowing for the moment.

Monster Iestyn (talk) 03:18, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

It appears that Fauna Sinica. Insect Vol. 40. from 2005 did indeed treat it as a valid species (according to its contents), but since I cannot currently view the text itself I do not know whether this was relying on outdated literature or is an intentional upgrade from subspecies status. Monster Iestyn (talk) 16:09, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Hello fellow editors,

I have just modified 1 external links on Trichochrysea hirta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:06, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply