From Wikispecies
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Schlumpberger (2012) classification is followed here, dividing the subtribe in many monophyletic genera. This might not be generally followed in the future, in favour of a large Echinopsis sens. lat. including most genera in the subtribe. However, as today, a great deal of the generally accepted species lack combinations under Echinopsis. Uleli (talk) 20:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

However, the segregation of Echinopsis sensu Schlumpberger (2012) is itself highly controversial and should not have been undertaken c.f. Anceschi & Magli (2013) and for a synopsis see Hernández-Ledesma (2015). The most conservative approach, based upon Hunt (2006), Hernández-Ledesma (2015) and generic circumscriptions in COL, should have been retained until consensus has been reached. However, I will not edit out the problem. Andyboorman (talk) 16:03, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow editors,

I have just modified 1 external links on Trichocereinae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:12, 6 April 2019 (UTC)