Talk:Sylvainia natalensis

>not yet in some sources

Yes, that's why I cited the currently existent entry on POWO as source of (most parts of) the distribution. I have thought that we editors are to place what we actually saw under Links sections since our implementation of {{Taxonbar}}. Or am I misunderstanding something? --Eryk Kij (talk) 16:29, 29 October 2023 (UTC)#

Edit how you wish, but please be advised that IPNI and POWO will update on the next round, which is why I changed your edits. Andyboorman (talk) 16:43, 29 October 2023 (UTC)