Talk:Senecio petraeus

Wrong picture?

not Senecio petraeus

Upright, slightly spider-webed, annual with up to 40 cm long, mainly branched in the upper half stems. Basal leaves ovate, entire or dentate, short petiolate, petioles eilanzettlich, obtuse, dentate or shallowly lobed, ear-stemmed. Differs from similar annual species with ray florets due to missing outer bracts and leaves that are not or only slightly lobed. look https://plants.jstor.org/compilation/senecio.petraeus https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/35239280 possibly Senecio jacobsenii--Felix Riegel (talk) 08:46, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! I've removed the incorrect pic (and sent it to Category:Unidentified Senecio at Commons) - MPF (talk) 21:32, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

@Felix Riegel: can you tell if this other photo is correctly labelled or not, please (click on photo for full size)? - MPF (talk) 23:02, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Unidentified Senecio (Botanischer Garten Freiburg).jpg

Added: I see you have already said not on its Commons talk page :-) so it too is now moved to Unidentified Senecio - MPF (talk) 23:07, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

For Picture of Senecio petraeus look https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?place_id=any&subview=grid&taxon_id=961756 --Felix Riegel (talk) 21:46, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────┘ Hello Felix Riegel. Your iNaturalist.org Senecio petraeus photos are very good and descriptive of the taxon. Unfortunately they are all licensed using CC-BY-NC and can therefore not be used in Wikimedia. (Adding ping to MPF for notification.) Best regards, Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 01:56, 18 November 2019 (UTC).

Senecio petraeus picture now in https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Senecio_petraeus.jpg --Felix Riegel (talk) 15:01, 19 November 2019 (UTC)