Talk:Faramea paupera

status disputed

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As I have mentioned in the entry, Brazilian botanists and C.M. Taylor place Faramea paupera under F. capillipes, while PWO treats them as separate taxa. Note that no types of F. paupera seem to have experienced any determination change. --Eryk Kij (talk) 06:23, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow editors,

I have just modified 1 external links on Faramea paupera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20221121222426/https://collections-botany.fieldmuseum.org/catalogue/252711 to https://collections-botany.fieldmuseum.org/catalogue/252711

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:39, 27 June 2025 (UTC)Reply