Do not delete.
By deleting articles on anything, including Cannabaceae, you are stopping people from getting the whole picture. Just because you delete it doesn't mean it doesn't exist, so whats the point in deleting it
Yes, delete to rm vandalism at start of history; data moved to Cannabaceae/temp - MPF 15:27, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
The genus Celtis should be deleted from this page and added to the Elm family; Ulmaceae No, see:
- Spitaler, R.; Gurschler, S.; Ellmerer, E.; Schubert, B.; Sgarbossa, M.; Zidorn, C. (in press): Flavonoids from Celtis australis (Cannabaceae). Biochemical systematics and ecology, doi:10.1016/j.bse.2008.11.020
Stho002 05:26, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- No paper states the species is in this family.
External links modified
Hello fellow editors,
I have just modified 1 external links on Cannabaceae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/19971118034306/http://www.rbgkew.org.uk/cgi-bin/web.dbs/genlist.pl?CANNABACEAE to http://www.rbgkew.org.uk/cgi-bin/web.dbs/genlist.pl?Cannabaceae
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:44, 8 July 2017 (UTC)