Talk:Cetartiodactyla
In the template should appear a link to the rules. I don't know what is wrong in the article. I've imitated Artiodactyla. Llull 17:04, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- There has been no answer, then I remove the template. Llull 07:33, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- We do not mix levels on a single line. This page mixes ordo and subordo. The subordo should not appear on this page. My understanding is that Cetartiodactylais is a superorder consisting of Cetacea and Artiodactyla but that is not reflected here. Open2universe 12:21, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Artiodactyla is a paraphyletic group, then never is included as a order of Cetartiodactyla. Today the systematisation is that this group is composed by the order Cetacea and the suborders of the old Cetacea. Without Artiodactyla. See Artiodactyla and Cetartiodacytla articles in the English Wikipedia, please. Llull 20:36, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- We do not mix levels on a single line. This page mixes ordo and subordo. The subordo should not appear on this page. My understanding is that Cetartiodactylais is a superorder consisting of Cetacea and Artiodactyla but that is not reflected here. Open2universe 12:21, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
From my discussion page:
- Hi, Your entry does not conform to standard formatting because it is an orphan (no other pages link to it). You may want to discuss a major update in mammalian taxonomy (which I personally do not contest, btw) in the Village Pump first. Please do not remove templates from pages without discussion (not everybody is constant online here, some answers may take days to weeks). Thanks. Lycaon 08:05, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
I think that it's not wise to include only one taxonimation if each author suggest new ways of classifications. In this case that RNAr analysis demostrated that Artiodactyla was a false group it's obvious that one day will desappear from the textbooks. Llull 20:43, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Excuse my English level that sometimes causes that I seem rude. Llull 20:47, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well, after two long months without answers and changes I think the template can be deleted. Llull 13:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Taxonavigation has not been fixed. Lycaon 12:00, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
The reason thaht the clade Cetartiodactyla was created was that Artiodacyla* is paraphlyetic. Then, in this context is not possible to put Artiodacyla* as a subgroup of Cetartiodactyla. 88.25.161.109 20:56, 5 May 2007 (UTC)