Wikispecies:Administrators/Archive 4

From Wikispecies
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Franz Xaver (talkcontribsblockall projects)

I'd like to nominate User:Franz Xaver for adminship. Following the links in the headline he is a very experienced editor. And I appreciate his well-considered contributions in discussions. His adminship will be a benefit for the project. Murma174 (talk) 11:27, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Accepted Thanks for the nomination! I promise to try my best. --Franz Xaver (talk) 13:29, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Poll started 13:29, 6 July 2016. Poll ends 13:29, 13 July 2016. --Murma174 (talk) 14:18, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Poll closed as promoted. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 13:48, 13 July 2016 (UTC).

Symbol support vote.svg Support

  1. Franz is one of the most solid & serious users among us. Mariusm (talk) 12:41, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
  2. Murma174 (talk) 14:18, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
  3. Got my vote. Andyboorman (talk) 15:07, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
  4. ...with great conviction. Orchi (talk) 16:10, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
  5. RLJ (talk) 18:35, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
  6. Dan Koehl (talk) 08:52, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
  7. Faendalimas talk 17:33, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
  8. Happy to support. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:54, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
  9. Definitely support. Neferkheperre (talk) 12:21, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
  10. Quite good. --Stang 05:54, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose

Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral




A sockpuppet of you (talkcontribsblockall projects)

{{subst:RFA|a sockpuppet of you|ill be good i promise}} — The preceding unsigned comment was added by A sockpuppet of you (talkcontribs) 19:27, 24 August 2016.

no Denied Closed as not promoted. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 02:22, 2 September 2016 (UTC).

Symbol support vote.svg Support

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose

  1. In my opinion this user is not yet experienced enough, on the grounds of the very low edit count (2 edits as of now, in a total of 5 wikis.)Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 15:21, 25 August 2016 (UTC).
  2. Agreed. Andyboorman (talk) 15:43, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
  3. Agreed. Mariusm (talk) 15:44, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
  4. Maybe this is an experienced sockpuppet making bad jokes? Franz Xaver (talk) 15:52, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
  5. +1 --Murma174 (talk) 16:17, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
  6. Agreed. I saw this briefly yesterday and thought it was just strange. Low edit count, not even a user page. Not my idea of an experienced editor. Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 16:38, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
  7. Almost total lack of info. Neferkheperre (talk) 15:53, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
  8. Agreed. Dan Koehl (talk) 21:53, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
  9. Jianhui67 (talk) 07:47, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  10. Furthermore, I have blocked the account indefinitely as the username is not acceptable. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral


Hector Bottai (talkcontribsblockall projects)

Theres 27 admins out of 195 active WS users, and it would be great to have more admins, who speak other languages than English. Hector has been with us almost three years, has made over 5 000 edits, and is very active creating and editing at an acceptable quality level all the > 3500 species plus genera, families, and so on of neotropical birds at the Spanish Wikipedia and also maintain the taxonomic dynamic update; his work at Wikispecies is a natural complement to that. Dan Koehl (talk) 19:32, 1 October 2016 (UTC) Dan Koehl (talk) 19:32, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Please wait for Hector to confirm, if he accept this nomination, before you vote!
I accept to be an Administrator.--Hector Bottai (talk) 21:18, 1 October 2016 (UTC) (copied from Hector's talk page)
Poll started 21:40, 1 October 2016. Poll ends 21:40, 7 October 2016. Dan Koehl (talk) 22:17, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Poll closed as promoted. Dan Koehl (talk) 12:48, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Support

  1. --Murma174 (talk) 21:40, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
  2. --Neferkheperre (talk) 12:26, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
  3. --Andyboorman (talk) 15:26, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
  4. --RLJ (talk) 19:44, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
  5. --Zerabat (talk) 13:01, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
  6. Jianhui67 (talk) 13:31, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
  7. -- Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 03:34, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Floscuculi (talkcontribsblockall projects)

Wikispecies will soon loose some 5 admins, who hasn't been active since 2014. Theres presently 28 admins out of 209 active WS users, and its good to have more admins who speak other languages than English. Floscuculi has made over 21 000 edits since 2011, and is editor at the Finnish speaking Wikipedia. Dan Koehl (talk) 11:29, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination accepted. I'm grateful. --Floscuculi (talk) 16:16, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Poll started 19:30, 4 November 2016 (UTC). Poll ends 19:30, 11 November 2016 (UTC). Dan Koehl (talk) 19:30, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Poll closed as promoted. Dan Koehl (talk) 19:22, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support

  1. Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 00:58, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
  2. MKOliver (talk) 03:10, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
  3. Murma174 (talk) 07:50, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
  4. Andyboorman (talk) 08:46, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
  5. Neferkheperre (talk) 12:58, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
  6. Alan Cassidy (talk) 15.49, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
  7. Seems good candidate and can be trusted with the bit. — TBhagat (talk) 14:55, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
  8. Alvaro Molina (Hablemos) 23:26, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
  9. OK, why not? Jianhui67 (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
  10. --RLJ (talk) 16:23, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose

Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral

  1. Not that I'm against Floscuculi becoming an admin, nevertheless I puzzle over the question whether we don't need some added value to ameliorate a person who's making an abundance of good edits yet fails to participate in discussions or raise his hand to vote on important issues, not that there are many such persons around to choose from unfortunately. Mariusm (talk) 11:02, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Icon Bubble.png Discussion

  • Something has certainly gone wrong with this template. In order to comment, I had to edit from link at top of page. Section links do not function at all. Neferkheperre (talk) 12:58, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Yeah ! It's because it is translation page. This proposal added revisions are not yet marked for translations. So that this error is happening. :) RegardsTBhagat (talk) 14:40, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Also, no template gone wrong. RegardsTBhagat (talk) 14:48, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
The surrounding the first section headings prevent the markup from recognizing the first sections as such hence the inability to edit the individual sections. I moved the so they don't encompass the "==". Now it's all right. Mariusm (talk) 15:11, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Missed the voting so I would put this under discussion rather than voting oppose on this nomination. I usually don't see eye to eye with User:Mariusm on many matters but he raised a very valid point. Floscuculi doesn't appear to be engaged in conversating with others. He does not engage in discussing with others on user talk pages nor policies at all and barely uses article talk page. A long time editor in this project would have ample opportunities to participate in discussion and shape the project. The last thing we need is an admin who performs actions or does something controversial but won't explain their rationale. OhanaUnitedTalk page 18:53, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Боровков Роман (talkcontribsblockall projects)

Висуваю себе в кандидати.--Боровков Роман (talk) 07:01, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

The Ukrainian text translates into "Nominates himself as a candidate." Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 22:01, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Poll started 22:01, 13 November 2016 (UTC). Poll ends 22:02, 20 November 2016 (UTC). Tommy Kronkvist (talk) Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 22:01, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Poll closed as not promoted. Dan Koehl (talk) 12:49, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose

  1. The user is blocked indefinitely from Wikimedia Commons for repeatedly uploading unfree media, even after several warnings. Out of a total of 1,624 edits to Wikimedia only 25 of them were made on Wikispecies. Out of those 25 edits, 2 have been deleted by administrators. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 22:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
  2. Sounds like this is a non-starter. Accassidy (talk) 00:03, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
  3. @Боровков Роман: it was meant as a joke, right? Mariusm (talk) 06:00, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
  4. Non starter Andyboorman (talk) 09:12, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
  5. Don't see, how WS should have a benefit from this candidate. --Franz Xaver (talk) 10:26, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
  6. 25 edits is not enough for autopatrolled status, let alone adminship. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
  7. not as yet. I will take it on good faith it is a serious application, but there is not enough here. The mentioned ban on Commons is an issue to me also. Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 21:15, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral

Icon Bubble.png Discussion

At the very least you ought to have a user page completed with a small biopic. In addition you should give us some reasons why your becoming an Admin will benefit the community. Thanks Andyboorman (talk) 09:49, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Andy and fellow admins, please see Requirements for requesting elevated user rights at the Administrators' Noticeboard. Of course, the discussion is open for non-admins as well. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 00:51, 14 November 2016 (UTC).

Thiotrix (talkcontribsblockall projects)

Id like to nominate Thiotrix for admin. Theres 31 admins out of 214 active WS users, and it would be great to have more admins, since there will soon only be 26, due to 5 admins incativity. Thiotrix has been with us almost eight years, has made over 10 000 edits on WS, over 5 000 on dewiki, and is very active at Wikidata ond commons, and has accepted admin nomination. Dan Koehl (talk) 14:32, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Yes I accept the nomination for Admin and will contribute to further improvement of this wiki. Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 14:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Poll started 14:40, 30 January 2017. Poll ends 14:40, 06 February 2017. Dan Koehl (talk) 15:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Poll closed as promoted. Dan Koehl (talk) 13:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks to you all for voting and for your confidence. I will try my best and learn these admin skills, and I like to invite the experienced admins for their advice about the usual "How-to"s on Wikispecies. --Thiotrix (talk) 07:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Support

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- BanKris (talk) 14:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:00, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- I'm glad to see a candidate who's also versed in taxonomy. Mariusm (talk) 16:00, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  4. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Orchi (talk) 16:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  5. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- RLJ (talk) 16:34, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  6. Symbol support vote.svg Support – Good Candidate. Alvaro Molina (Hablemos) 18:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  7. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 18:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  8. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Andyboorman (talk) 18:49, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  9. Symbol support vote.svg SupportJustin (koavf)TCM 21:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
  10. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Floscuculi (talk) 00:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
  11. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Jianhui67 (talk) 11:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
  12. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Murma174 (talk) 16:57, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
  13. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Franz Xaver (talk) 12:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
  14. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- MKOliver (talk) 04:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
  15. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Samuele2002 (talk) 10:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
  16. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Neferkheperre (talk) 12:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

AlvaroMolina (talkcontribsblockall projects)

I would like to nominate User:AlvaroMolina for adminship. He is an experienced user with a good understanding of how the community works. AlvaroMolina is already a Translation Administrator here on Wikispecies,(verify) as well as bureaucrat on Spanish Wikinews and the Wikipedia Test2 site, and administrator on several other Wikinews- and Wikimedia test sites.(verify)Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 07:14, 3 June 2017 (UTC).

I accept this nomination. Thanks. —Alvaro Molina ( - ) 08:00, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Poll started 08:00, 3 June 2017 (UTC). Poll will end at 08:00, 10 June 2017 (UTC).
Poll closed as promoted. Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 10:41, 10 June 2017 (UTC).

Support

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent choice, glad you accepted nomination. Dan Koehl (talk) 14:07, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support also agree an excellent choice. Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 16:43, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support --RLJ (talk) 20:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
  4. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Franz Xaver (talk) 07:29, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
  5. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Orchi (talk) 07:58, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
  6. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Reassured thank you for the comments below. Andyboorman (talk) 17:44, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
  7. Symbol support vote.svg Support Burmeister (talk) 18:27, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Oppose

# Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose In view of the precedents where well-meaning admins with no taxonomic background failed to understand the special needs or the ongoing controversies in WS, unwittingly harming it with unbalanced decisions and notwithstanding Alvaro Molina's wiki proficiency I can't see how this nomination can be of any meaningful use to WS. Mariusm (talk) 04:42, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Mariusm (talk) 14:51, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments

A point I would like to make here. @Mariusm: Of course you can have your view and vote the way you feel you should and I am not asking you to reconsider. But here is the thing. We need a selection of Admins with different abilities, different knowledge sets. We do need some that are more administrative in their knowledge and understanding of Wikimedia. Are all well intentioned admins without a taxonomic background of use to Wikispecies, no of course not. It is an issue to be kept in check. However, there are many functions on a Wiki that are not taxonomic, we need people to do these things and advise those of us who are taxonomists. None of our admins are experienced in translation, I think it is negligent to not fill that void. Our primary focus is taxonomy, and that needs to be respected. But there are other jobs to do here. Cheers Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 23:49, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

I would also like to clarify that in case of being chosen, my functions would focus on dealing with cases of obvious speedy deletion (for example: pages that are obviously not taxonomical like Wikipedia biographies or spam), block users who perform repeated vandalism or spam and continue working with translations; all following the corresponding policies. For the tranquility of Mariusm and the other users, I will not participate in discussions where I do not know or know the background issues, Wikispecies has several experienced administrators with the purpose and main objective of this project and always in case of doubt I will let them act. Regards. —Alvaro Molina ( - ) 00:45, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
I want to clarify that my vote wasn't a personal repudiation of Alvaro Molina adminship or my doubting of his qualifications which may be considerable, but that it reflects a disquiet of a non taxonomy-oriented admin-majority affecting the WS direction-moving in undesirable ways through votes, proposals, schemes, projects etc. (a case in point was the proposal to translate "References" and "Name" section-titles). Mariusm (talk) 04:42, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
@Mariusm: At no time have I thought that, his arguments are valid and I have no objections with that; my intention as indicated above will not be to participate in discussions or aspects related to the taxonomy, I do not rule out in some future that I can internalize in that aspect, but if I do not have clarity on what should be done in a certain related subject, always I will let the other administrators who dominate the taxonomy or who have more experience take care of that. My focus will be on the maintenance that any administrator of a Wikimedia project does (delete, block, (semi)-protect, etc.) and manage the translations of the pages as I have done the last months. —Alvaro Molina ( - ) 13:47, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
@AlvaroMolina: I appreciate your commitment and your understanding and I changed my voting to neutral. Mariusm (talk) 14:51, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Kaganer (talkcontribsblockall projects)

For improving translatable help pages and categories. Requested "administrator" and "translation administrator" rights (both flags at once). As example, for improving translation markup in Wikispecies:Localization etc. I have admin rights on Meta-wiki and MediaWiki.org (mainly for these same goals), and also translation admin rights in Wikidata, Commons, Meta-wiki and MediaWiki.org. --Kaganer (talk) 09:32, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

PS: Reasons for regular adminship:
  1. In Wikispecies some project pages is (or may be in future) fully protected (Wikispecies:Localization, Wikispecies:Oversight etc.); for any small improvenets needs requestings to other administratrs.
  2. MediaWiki messages (related with Wikispecies:Localization) is available for editing ('editinterface' right) for regular administrators only (but not for translation administrators)
  3. Special:PageTranslationDeletePage (for deletion incorrect translations) is currently available for regular administrators only (but not for translation administrators without sysop rights);
--Kaganer (talk) 16:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Poll starts 09:32, 17 September 2017 (UTC); poll closes 09:32, 24 September 2017. OhanaUnitedTalk page 19:53, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Nota bene: This poll only regards the request for Administrator user rights. The poll for Translation Administrator user rights can be found here.
Poll closed as not promoted. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 10:22, 24 September 2017 (UTC).

Discussion

Could you explain what tasks that require admin flag to perform that cannot be accomplished with translation admin flag? OhanaUnitedTalk page 19:55, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Normally admin rights are only granted to contributors on taxon pages. Please explain why you need these rights. I support translation rights however. Andyboorman (talk) 09:47, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Poll

Support

  1. for translator flag Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:33, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
    Action was not feasible Nonvalid. @Pigsonthewing: i.e. Andy Mabbett: Please note that the poll for Kaganer's request for Translation admin user rights can be found here. Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 14:00, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. for admin flag - no valid justification given Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:33, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
  2. Neither needed nor justifiable. Mariusm (talk) 13:31, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
    @Mariusm and Pigsonthewing: I'm sorry, see explanation in this edit. --Kaganer (talk) 16:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
  3. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose There is no demonstrable need for administrator permission at this time, but like other users, I am not against permission from translation administrator. —Alvaro Molina ( - ) 01:04, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
  4. Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I do not see the need, as others have said no objection for translator. Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 22:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Neutral

Burmeister (talkcontribsblockall projects)

Id like to nominate Burmeister for admin. Theres presently 25 admins out of 218 active users, and its good to have more admins who speak more languages than English. Burmeister has made over 26 000 edits and been with us since 2008, and is a very active editor at the Portuguese speaking Wikipedia, as well as user at Wikidata. Dan Koehl (talk) 20:20, 16 February 2018 (UTC) Dan Koehl (talk) 20:20, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

I accept this nomination. Thanks. Burmeister (talk) 20:29, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Poll started 21:25, 16 February 2018. Poll ends 21:25, 23 February 2018. -- Dan Koehl (talk) 21:25, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Poll closed as promoted. Dan Koehl (talk) 21:28, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Support

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support Well known and trusted editor with admin experience. Cheers Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 01:09, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support -RLJ (talk) 11:16, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Thiotrix (talk) 12:29, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  4. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Orchi (talk) 13:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  5. Symbol support vote.svg Support Trusted and experienced user. —AlvaroMolina ( - ) 16:17, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
  6. Symbol support vote.svg Support. Good experience at Wikispecies. No concerns here. --Stïnger (会話) 18:31, 17 February 2018 (UTC).
  7. Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Andyboorman (talk) 13:37, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
  8. Symbol support vote.svg Support A good choice. — Mariusm (talk) 13:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
  9. Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes indeed. MKOliver (talk) 03:38, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral


RLJ (talkcontribsblockall projects)

Id like to nominate RLJ for admin. Theres presently 26 out of 222 active users, and its good to have more admins who speak more languages than English. RLJ is taking responsibility for the project in different ways, directly as well as in discussions, has made over 22 000 edits and been with us since 2010, and is a very active editor at the German speaking Wikipedia, as well as user at Wikidata, and Commons. Dan Koehl (talk) 16:12, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

  • Accepted Thank you very much for the nomination! I will try to give my best for the benefit of the project. -RLJ (talk) 16:17, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Poll started 16:25, 7 January 2019. Poll ends 16:25, 14 January 2019. -- Dan Koehl (talk) 16:25, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Poll closed as promoted. Dan Koehl (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Support

  1. Burmeister (talk) 16:45, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
  2. Unreservedly Andyboorman (talk) 17:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
  3. Orchi (talk) 17:45, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
  4. Experienced in taxonomy and active cross-wiki-editor. Thiotrix (talk) 14:04, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
  5. Franz Xaver (talk) 14:52, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
  6. Mariusm (talk) 10:59, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
  7. Floscuculi (talk) 21:28, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
  8. --Murma174 (talk) 21:47, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
  9. Korg (talk) 19:56, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:40, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Neutral