The genera should not have been deleted unless the deletor was planning on classifying them later. The goal the system is to get out taxonavigational information, and more information is sometimes worth not adhering to templates.
Added rhododendron - source http://www.itis.usda.gov:8080/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=23700 --Edgester 17:46, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
- It doesn't make sense to add genera at the subfamilia level. Taxonomy is all about adhering to templates. Lycaon 21:11, 5 February 2006 (UTC)