Cylindroleberididae
Taxonavigation
[edit]| Taxonavigation: Cylindroleberidoidea |
|---|
|
Superregnum: Eukaryota |
Familia: Cylindroleberididae
Subfamiliae:
Asteropteroninae –
Cyclasteropinae –
Cylindroleberidinae –
Macroasteropteroninae
Genera (incertae sedis):
†Colymbosathon –
†Hungaroleberis –
†Juraleberis –
†Nasunaris –
†Pauline –
Toyoshioleberis
Overview of genera:
Actinoseta –
Amboleberis –
Asterope –
Asteropella –
Asteropteron –
Asteropterygion –
Bathyleberis –
Bruuniella –
Cyclasterope –
Cycloleberis –
Cylindroleberis –
Diasterope –
Empoulsenia –
Heptonema –
Leuroleberis –
Macroasteropteron –
Microasteropteron –
Parasterope –
†Pauline –
Polyleberis –
Postasterope –
Prionotoleberis –
Skogsbergiella –
Synasterope –
Xenoleberis
Name
[edit]Cylindroleberididae Mueller, 1906: 12, 32 (as "Cylindroleberinae")
- Type genus: Cylindroleberis Brady, 1867
References
[edit]Primary references
[edit]- Müller, G.W. 1906. Die Ostracoden der Siboga-Expedition. Siboga-Expeditie: Uitkomsten op zoölogisch, botanisch, oceanographisch en geologisch gebied verzameld in Nederlandsch Oost-Indië 1899-1900 aan boord H. M. Siboga onder commando van Luitenant ter zee 1e kl. G. F. Tydeman uitgegeven door Dr. Max Weber 30: [i]–[iii], 1–40, pls. I–IX. BHL Reference page.
Additional references
[edit]- Chavtur, V.G. & Keyser, D. 2015. Benthic Ostracods of Skogsbergiella (Myodocopina: Cylindroleberididae) from the Southern Ocean. Zootaxa 4048(4): 508–522. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4048.4.3 Preview (PDF) Reference page.
- Pham, H.T.M. & Karanovic, I. 2022. Four new Parasterope (Ostracoda, Myodocopina) from the Northwest Pacific and their phylogeny based on 16S rRNA. ZooKeys 1095ː 13–42. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1095.77996
Reference page. - Syme, A.E. & Poore, G.C.B. 2006: A checklist of species of Cylindroleberididae (Crustacea: Ostracoda). Museum Victoria Science Reports, 9: 1–20. PDF
- Syme, A.E. & Oakley, T.H. 2012: Dispersal between Shallow and Abyssal Seas and Evolutionary Loss and Regain of Compound Eyes in Cylindroleberidid Ostracods: Conflicting Conclusions from Different Comparative Methods. Systematic Biology, 61 (2): 314–336. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syr085