Wikispecies:Administrators/Archive 2

From Wikispecies

Jump to: navigation, search
English: This page contains finished discussion. Do not edit it, please
Українська: Ця сторінка містить обговорення, які вже завершилися. Прохання її не редагувати.


Contents

[edit] Requests for adminship status

[edit] Maxim (talk · contribs) (administrator)

I'm an admin at Commons and enwiki, and I joined here to revert some vandalism. I've been doing that for the past few months, and another "job" I do is to tag test pages. Now, these pages can sit around Category:Candidates for speedy deletion for over 6 hours, and it would be easier for all if I do it. Also, I'm applying for the bureaucrat flag at the same time, as I strongly believe that on such a small wiki, any admin can do the bureaucrat's job as it's such a little extension. Monobi has applied three days after he became an admin, and he'll certainly do fine; I don't see any problem with me getting both flags at the same time. After some consideration, I've decided it would be better for me to stick with +admin only. There are enough 'crats atm and I don't think I've been here enough to assume that role as well. Maxim(talk) 13:05, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Poll starts 13:05, 13 March 2008 (UTC); poll ends 13:05, 20 March 2008 (UTC). OhanaUnitedTalk page 14:25, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Poll closed, Maxim = sysopus. ---- Anonymous DissidentTalk 05:30, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Support

  1. Ucucha (talk) 16:49, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. If you weren't an admin in another project(s), then I won't be convinced to support. However, if you can deal with en.wp drama, you're more than capable of handling WikiSpecies' drama. OhanaUnitedTalk page 21:10, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
    Drama here??? LOL!! Maxim(talk) 21:16, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
    Yes, drama, it's an essential ingredient for life! OhanaUnitedTalk page 22:39, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
    rather sporadic but there is defiantly wikispecies drama Kevmin 05:29, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. Support --Kevmin 05:29, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. Mønobi 18:30, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
  5. Support for both flags, it's no big deal whatsoever. Majorly (talk) 16:06, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
  6. Support Open2universe | Talk 03:16, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
  7. Support for admin. Lycaon 08:36, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Oppose

  1. I'm not to eager with the little number of contributions and the two months of service so far. Sorry. Lycaon 00:34, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
    Would you have any suggestions upon which I can improve? Or do you want me to stick around for a month or two more and then try again? Maxim(talk) 00:42, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
    The latter would probably be sufficient for me. Say end of April? Lycaon 06:26, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
    A reasonable time to retry, if this request doesn't pass. Maxim(talk) 13:49, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
    How about let him be admin in the mean time and at the end of April, Maxim will run for Rfb? OhanaUnitedTalk page 14:15, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
    That sounds like a reasonable idea, good suggestion OhanaUnited. Maximillion Pegasus 15:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
    But to be honest, what's the difference? On such a small project, I think any admin can be trusted to be a bureaucrat, as usually there's almost no promotions, renames or flaggings to be done. On the other hand, if because of my experience and time spent here you feel it's best I be an admin for a bit then apply for 'crat, I'm cool with that. Maxim(talk) 16:18, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
    This is called compromising, Maxim. OhanaUnitedTalk page 21:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
    Obviously. I was making sure. ;-) Maxim(talk) 21:54, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
    For what it's worth, Lycaon, I was suggesting to Maxim that he should be an admin here because I was getting tired of seeing his name whenever I looked at Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 23:34, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Neutral

[edit] "Other"

  1. As I've noted above, I'm not a fan of the "make everyone a 'crat" concept. I've personally told Maxim he should run for adminship, which I'm totally supporting, but not so much for the 'cratship. As I've said above, this isn't a reflection on him, it's just my personal feelings about it. EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:59, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Electrical Experiment (talk · contribs)

Failed, (0/5/0)

I want to be a admin because I Have a education based on Plant and I know I Could do good. ElectricalExperiment 14:15, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Began 14:15, 8 June 2008; ended 20:50, 15 June 2008 (UTC).

[edit] Support

[edit] Oppose

  1. Sorry, but you just haven't been here long enough. Come back to RfA in ~2 - 3 months and I'll be happy to support. Mønobi (talk) 02:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  2. Same reason as Monobi. I can't support a candidate without first knowing his contributions throughly. OhanaUnitedTalk page 04:24, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  3. I echo Monobi. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 07:35, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  4. Technically you shouldn't request adminship until you have been an editor for at least two months. --Open2universe | Talk 13:14, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
  5. And please read the help files on how to contribute. Lycaon 11:35, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Neutral

[edit] Requests for bureaucratship status

[edit] EVula

[This is a request for bureaucratship] For those that don't know me, I've been an administrator around here since November 27, and am an admin on the English Wikipedia, Commons, and Meta (the latter two being language-independent projects like Wikispecies), and am also a bureaucrat of a Wikia project. I'd like to add another active bureaucrat to the ranks here, simply to keep things running if one or two of them are on vacation (as is the case right now).

Admittedly, it's not like there are many RfAs around here, but hey, I figure I could still help out now and then. Who knows, maybe we'll have some sort of massive renaming emergency sometime. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:31, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Poll starts 21:31, 10 March 2008 (UTC); poll ends 21:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC). Ucucha (talk) 17:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Poll closed; EVula is a bureaucrat now. Ucucha (talk) 14:26, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Support

  1. But I really think we should set +crat for all admins. This is a small wiki, and bureaucratship here is just a few extra buttons, and we can trust all admins to do it. Maxim(talk) 02:08, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. Support EVula as crat as well as Maxim's motion. OhanaUnitedTalk page 02:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. All the way and further =] ---- Anonymous DissidentTalk 05:20, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. Ucucha (talk) 14:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  5. Mønobi 20:21, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  6. Lycaon 17:14, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  7. Kevmin 05:22, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Oppose

[edit] Neutral

[edit] User:Anonymous Dissident (bureaucrat)

I think we should, indeed, instead of putting +crat on all admins, have anyone who *wants* to be a crat, and who is actually active, standing, so as to flush out those who are simply too inactive to actually notice this revelation. I don't care either way; I'd prefer it anyway if I could be placed under review, by the small community here, to judge whether I am suitable on a personal basis.

I've been an admin for almost 2 months now, and I am an admin on four other wikis, including enwp and meta-wiki. Over my time on Wikimedia, I have learned the general customs of being around, and, further, while I've been on Wikispecies, I feel I have become fairly intimate with it's unique way of doing things. Therefore, I think I would be able to adequately step into the shoes of bureaucrat.

Finally, I think it may be prudent to do some cleanup... as Monobi has noted on WS:V, it might be time to remove the bits from some highly inactive people, and that would include more than a few of the current crats. ---- Anonymous DissidentTalk 05:20, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Poll starts 5:20, 11 March 2008 (UTC); poll ends 5:20, 18 March 2008 (UTC). Ucucha (talk) 17:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Poll closed; Anonymous Dissident is a bureaucrat now. Ucucha (talk) 14:26, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Support

  1. Per my support in EVula's RfB. Maxim(talk) 12:28, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. Ucucha (talk) 14:46, 11 March 2008 (UTC) and agreeing with introductory statement
  3. OhanaUnitedTalk page 14:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. Mønobi 20:21, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  5. Kevmin 05:23, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
  6. Plenty of experience (taking into account his other adminships), in my estimation. EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:54, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Oppose

[edit] Neutral

[edit] User:Monobi (bureaucrat)

Being a sysop for 3 days gives me all the experience I need to become a 'crat </joke>. I'll throw myself into the mix, but I'd rather it be standard practice for both the sysop and and the 'crat flag to be given at the same time. Confirmation for the current sysops is the best way to go about this, however. Likewise I'm adding myself. Mønobi 20:21, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Poll starts 20:21, 11 March 2008 (UTC); poll ends 20:21, 18 March 2008 (UTC). Ucucha (talk) 17:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Poll closed; Monobi is a bureaucrat now. Ucucha (talk) 19:24, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Support

  1. Per my comments in EVula's and AnonDiss' RfBs. Maxim(talk) 20:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 05:11, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. OhanaUnitedTalk page 07:15, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. Ucucha (talk) 17:52, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  5. Kevmin 05:24, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
  6. Definitely! Majorly (talk) 16:05, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Oppose

[edit] Neutral

  1. I'm not as big a fan of the "everyone's a 'crat!" idea as everyone else is. I'm neutral only because of Monobi's relative newness to being a WS administrator, and does not reflect poorly on them as a contributor to the project. EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] OhanaUnited (bureaucrat)

After watching others and giving myself a day to think about it, I decided to run for RfB. I have been actively editing, doing maintenance works, as well as helping new users on WikiSpecies. I visit here on daily basis so if there is any emergency, I will be available very quickly. Therefore I choose to step up and nominate myself for bureaucratship. OhanaUnitedTalk page 07:15, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Poll starts 7:15, 12 March 2008 (UTC); poll ends 7:15, 19 March 2008 (UTC). Ucucha (talk) 17:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Poll closed (I realise I am heaps early, but, eh, no big difference). Is now 'crat. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 20:22, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Support

  1. ---- Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. Per all my other supports. Maxim(talk) 12:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. Ucucha (talk) 17:51, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. Mønobi 03:14, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
  5. Kevmin 05:25, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
  6. Yep Majorly (talk) 16:05, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Oppose

[edit] Neutral

  1. I'm not as big a fan of the "everyone's a 'crat!" idea as everyone else is. I'm neutral only because of OhanaUnited's relative newness to being a WS administrator, and does not reflect poorly on them as a contributor to the project. EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:57, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dario and Mario (bureaucrat)

Such others, I decided to candidate myself for bureaucrat. I am admin on pt-wiki, and on wikispecies I have been sysop since May 13, and during this period I think I made my functions as sysop. Despite I have not English as native language, I'm requesting the bureaucratship. Thanks :) -- Dario and Mario 21:14, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Poll starts 21:14, 13 March 2008 (UTC); 21:14, 20 March 2008 (UTC). OhanaUnitedTalk page 22:37, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Promoted. Mønobi 20:07, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Support

  1. Per my reasoning in above }RfXs. Maxim(talk) 21:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. Yes OhanaUnitedTalk page 22:37, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. Mønobi 02:41, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. Kevmin 05:25, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
  5. Ucucha (talk) 06:46, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
  6. Plenty experienced as a local sysop. EVula // talk // ☯ // 18:00, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
  7. I trust him a lot, very experienced WSian. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 20:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
  8. Support Open2universe | Talk 03:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Oppose

[edit] Neutral

[edit] Maxim (bureaucrat)

I've been a sysop here for a bit, and I think I could be of some benefit with the bureaucrat flag. The main reason is because I sometimes use high-speed scripts to do some maintenance tasks; quickly flagging myself as a bot (and unflagging when done) can help unclog recent changes. While bots go through approval, I think this is more of a case were not showing 50 deletions in a row in recent changes is a convenience to us all. Finally, I'm of the belief on small project such as this, being having both the admin and 'crat bits doesn't hurt. Maxim(talk) 01:26, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Poll starts 01:26, 25 May 2008 (UTC); poll ends 01:26, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Closed early. Maxim is promoted to bureaucrat. OhanaUnitedTalk page 19:12, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Support

  1. Support as promised in your last request OhanaUnitedTalk page 02:05, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
  2. ---- Anonymous DissidentTalk 14:58, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
  3. Though I'd actually prefer you to use a separate bot account. Ucucha (talk) 15:42, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
    That'd require adding +sysop +bot to it. It's less hassle and more easily traceable if I'd give me a bot flag for five mins to complete my task with minimal disruption. :-) Maxim(talk) 20:09, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
    I also recommend using a separate bot account. However, you can assign sysop & bot flag to your bot without asking us just like Monobi did to his bot (as long as it's for legitimate use) OhanaUnitedTalk page 00:38, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
    That's completely O.K., too. Maxim(talk) 01:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
  4. --Open2universe | Talk 01:23, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
  5. With the same comments on bots as OhanaUnited and Ucucha . — Lycaon 06:48, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
  6. No problem with the 'crat bit, but I do think you should create a MaximBot account. No need to jump through hoops for it. EVula // talk // ☯ // 04:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Oppose

[edit] Neutral

Retrieved from "http://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikispecies:Administrators/Archive_2"
Personal tools