User talk:白布飘扬

Welcome to Wikispecies!

Hello, and welcome to Wikispecies! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• Help:Contents provides a good introduction to editing Wikispecies.
• Templates are there to help you to follow our syntax and formatting standards.
• Have a look at Done and to do.

If you have named a taxon, then it is likely that there is (or will be) a Wikispecies page about you, and other pages about your published papers. Please see our advice and guidance for taxon authors.

If you have useful images to contribute to Wikispecies, please upload them at Wikimedia Commons. This is also true for video or audio files containing bird songs, whale vocalization, etc.

Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username (if you're logged in) and the date. Please also read the Wikispecies policy What Wikispecies is not. If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or in the Village Pump. Again, welcome! OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 12:18, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Autopatrolled rights

Dear 白布飘扬, You have been granted autopatrolled user rights, which may be granted to experienced Wikispecies users who have demonstrated an understanding of Wikispecies policies and guidelines. In addition to what registered users can do, autopatrollers can have one's own edits automatically marked as patrolled (autopatrol). The autopatrol user right is intended to reduce the workload of new page patrollers and causes pages created by autopatrolled users to be automatically marked as patrolled. For more information, read Wikispecies:Autopatrollers.

This user has autopatrolled rights on Wikispecies. (verify)

You may as autpatroller use the autopatroller user box on your user page. Copy and paste the following code on your user page:

{{User Autopatroller}}

Dan Koehl (talk) 21:30, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Changes in need of Patrol

Can you please patrol the changes by user ip-address 122.90.99.123, which you find here.If you click on (diff) for each file, you will see the option [Mark as patrolled] which you can click if you consider the change was correct. If you have any questions, just please ask me. Kind regards, Dan Koehl (talk) 14:06, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Patrolling rights

After you were granted patroller user rights, it seems you did zero patrolling. (since you are autopatroller, the pages you edit gets automatically marked. But if you have patrolled pages , and marked them patrolled, your edit gets a "marked revision (number) of page (page name) patrolled")

If you dont wish to patrol pages, this is no problem at all, but please inform me if you tried and experienced any difficaulties, or if you have any questions.

Since you have not made use of your patroller user rights, I need to know if you still want to keep them, because you plan to use them in the future, or likevise. If you are not interested in patrolling, you dont need to do anything, and I will remove the user rights in a couple of days.

In any case you will keep your autopatrol user right, but there is no need for both.

But please consider carrying out daily patrols of new pages and edits made by users who are not autopatrolled.

If you want to try to patrol pages:

In Special:NewPages you can see the not patrolled new pages with yellow background. Presently there are probably none, since the pages made today and the last days has been made by users who already have 'autopatrolled' user rights. But if you do, or you choose to see the last 500 newly made pages, you may se files with yellow background. You can click on such a file, and scroll down to absolute down-right corner, where you can read "mark as patrolled" or similair, becasue the contributor does not have autoptarolled/patrolled user rights. When you click on the link, the file becomes patrolled.

But theres older files that need patrolling. In unpatrolled pages on recent changes, and you will see a list of unpatrolled pages. You will see a red colored ! in front of the unpatrolled file. If you click on each diff, you can mark the diff patrolled.

Dan Koehl (talk) 14:38, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Dear 白布飘扬, I removed your patrol rights since you havnt used them during the last month. You are still autopatrolled, and should you wish start patrol pages in the future, you will get your patrol rights back. Best regards, Dan Koehl (talk) 23:47, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

B.S. Chang full name

@PeterR: asked me last week if I knew or could find out full name for Taiwan butterfly illustrator B.S. Chang. One of my Taiwan colleagues sent me this site in Chinese, which is apparently only available source. Could you help us with translating? Neferkheperre (talk) 10:11, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

I suppose if I gave you link it would be easier: B.S. Chang. Neferkheperre (talk) 10:14, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Join discussions

At the water pump is presently discussed two topics;

1.) is to follow a previous consensus and change all [[BASEPAGENAME]] into [[susbt:BASEPAGENAME]], something which already has started.

2.) is what to do with the Category: <<taxon name>> (<<any country>>) files created by Stephen Thorpe. Some 5 000 have so far been moved together at Candidates for speedy deletion, but concearn has been objected, that some of those files may be useful, in all, or that parts should be transfered somewhere, before a major mass delete. Please join the discussion at pump and take part in shaping a consensus.

Best regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Reverts

Good day. I have reverted your well meaning edits on Template:Brandisia, Orobanchaceae and Paulowniaceae. The reason is that the taxon pages now follow the scientific evidence provided by the papers in the Reference Section rather than the secondary sources. See also here. I will contact Hassler and ask why they do not follow the science. The Plant List is now out of date and no longer up-dated, so I would not expect them to have included evidence from the cited papers, hence my removal from the list. Best regards. Andyboorman (talk) 19:06, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

italic

Why are you adding this template in front of the image template? Andyboorman (talk) 18:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

@Andyboorman:The template is used to convert the title into the italic form. Name for genus, infragenus, species & infraspecies shall be written in italic form. -- 白布飘扬 (talk) 05:07, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi The image template without an additional tag does that for us, so there is no need to add an additional italics template. If you add the name of the taxon with a link to a page, then you will need the italics in the link, for example when illustrating a genus by a named species. We really do not like an unlabelled family, genus or infragenus, as there is no way of telling a user what species in the taxon is being illustrated by the image. The conclusion is that your use of the italic template is redundant and is not used by other editors. Hope this helps. Andyboorman (talk) 09:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

@Andyboorman: No, that is not regarding to the image template. The italic template is used to convert the page title into italic form. It could be placed at any place of the page, nothing to do with the image template. --白布飘扬 (talk) 11:32, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

OK got you. Thanks Andyboorman (talk) 11:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)