Talk:Litoria caerulea
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
I created this as best I could to what I thought it should look like because I have seen no other species which actually has anything written on it. I don't know how the book references are supposed to be written, so I have hopefully added enough information on the books, if anyone wants more, just ask and I will add it. And feel free to change it to the format that it is going to be on this site. LiquidGhoul
UtherSRG, can I get a reason behind you deleting the entire article please. LiquidGhoul
- The reason is that Wikispecies is intended as a taxonomic database, text should be included in Wikipedia. Ucucha (talk) 04:41, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
- Then what is this? Wikispecies:Templates
- Is this a new decision, or has it been like this as long as the website, because UtherSRG has done minor edits on that article before. Therefore, he didn't find a reason to delete it then.
- The idea of just having Wikispecies as a taxonomic database is plain stupid, and completely wrecks Wikispecies as a good resource. The idea should be to have an online equivalent of all the books for species identification.LiquidGhoul
- This? This is probably outdated. Wikispecies should include as few text as possible. It's mainly taxonomic. Identification may be included, but let's start with alpha taxonomy. Ucucha (talk) 14:09, 26 September 2005 (UTC)